2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Learning Readiness Among UKM Lecturers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in mobile learning environments, the perceived flexibility advantage is critical to learning effectiveness and efficiency (Clay 2011;Gedik et al 2012;Huang, Tang, Lee, & Yang, 2017;Sung et al 2015); that is, mobile technology enables individuals to access learning materials anytime and anywhere. This is very convenient and important for learners (Gedik et al, 2012;Hamat, Embi, & Hassan, 2012;Sung et al, 2015), mainly because the flexibility advantage of time and place in mobile learning helps learners gain knowledge more easily and conveniently. For example, Hamat et al (2012) have suggested that "mobile computing devices in various form factors such as tablets and smart phones have not only been a viable platform to carry out various tasks, but also being rapidly improved in terms of usability, processing power and connectivity" (p. 406).…”
Section: Perceived Flexibility Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in mobile learning environments, the perceived flexibility advantage is critical to learning effectiveness and efficiency (Clay 2011;Gedik et al 2012;Huang, Tang, Lee, & Yang, 2017;Sung et al 2015); that is, mobile technology enables individuals to access learning materials anytime and anywhere. This is very convenient and important for learners (Gedik et al, 2012;Hamat, Embi, & Hassan, 2012;Sung et al, 2015), mainly because the flexibility advantage of time and place in mobile learning helps learners gain knowledge more easily and conveniently. For example, Hamat et al (2012) have suggested that "mobile computing devices in various form factors such as tablets and smart phones have not only been a viable platform to carry out various tasks, but also being rapidly improved in terms of usability, processing power and connectivity" (p. 406).…”
Section: Perceived Flexibility Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of mLearning benefit awareness and the low level of mobile device ownership among academics are noted as being challenges that UKM needs to prioritise resolving in order to become mLearning ready. m-Learning is more than using mobile devices for e-learning; it requires a completely different mind-set in education and Hamat et al (2012) did not manage to apply this view to this study. Despite the fact that the Hamat et al (2012) study was titled mobile learning readiness among UKM lecturers, the actual m-Learning readiness assessment within the university was not discussed.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 M-learning Readiness Studiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A discussion of those found follows. Hamat et al (2012) assess m-Learning readiness at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). This study focuses on the functions and services that UKM lecturers believe they need for successful implementation of m-Learning within the university.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 M-learning Readiness Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As m-learning is a subset of e-learning, all the factors influence the acceptance of e-learning is replicated in m-learning. According to researchers Hamat et al (2012), they identified that e-learning and mobile learning are from the same foundations; therefore, e-learning acceptance factors can be reproduced to mobile learning design. The factors which influence the acceptance of e-learning are:-…”
Section: The Proposed Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%