Mobile phone-based interventions for mental health: A systematic meta-review of 14 meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Mobile phone-based interventions have been proposed as a means for reducing the burden of disease associated with mental illness. While numerous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have investigated this possibility, evidence remains unclear. We conducted a systematic meta-review of meta-analyses examining mobile phone-based interventions tested in randomized controlled trials. We synthesized results from 14 meta-analyses representing 145 randomized controlled trials and 47,940 participants. We identified 34 effect sizes representing unique pairings of participants, intervention, comparisons, and outcome (PICO) and graded the strength of the evidence as using umbrella review methodology. We failed to find convincing evidence of efficacy (i.e., n > 1000, p < 10−6, I2 < 50%, absence of publication bias); publication bias was rarely assessed for the representative effect sizes. Eight effect sizes provided highly suggestive evidence (i.e., n > 1000, p < 10−6), including smartphone interventions outperforming inactive controls on measures of psychological symptoms and quality of life (ds = 0.32 to 0.47) and text message-based interventions outperforming non-specific controls and active controls for smoking cessation (ds = 0.31 and 0.19, respectively). The magnitude of effects and strength of evidence tended to diminish as comparison conditions became more rigorous (i.e., inactive to active, non-specific to specific). Four effect sizes provided suggestive evidence, 14 effect sizes provided weak evidence, and eight effect sizes were non-significant. Despite substantial heterogeneity, no moderators were identified. Adverse effects were not reported. Taken together, results support the potential of mobile phone-based interventions and highlight key directions to guide providers, policy makers, clinical trialists, and meta-analysts working in this area.

The Grow It! app—longitudinal changes in adolescent well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a proof-of-concept study

“…This suggests the presence of sampling bias and therefore limits the generalizability of our results to the population. It also informs us that this may be the population that is most interested, motivated for and in need of mHealth support [ 35 ]. Whether indeed the Grow It!…”

E-Mental Health for People with Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review

“…For many, therapists trained in DBT are simply not accessible. E-mental health, which provides mental health services through digital information and communication technologies (e.g., smartphone applications, the Internet), has been widely used to promote mental health in the past decade [ 10 , 11 ]. E-mental health has the potential to increase cost-effectiveness [ 12 ], expand access to mental health resources [ 13 ], reduce the stigma associated with seeking traditional psychotherapy [ 14 ], and provide personalized psychological services [ 15 ].…”

Precision Digital Intervention for Depression Based on Social Rhythm Principles Adds Significantly to Outpatient Treatment

“…The pooled effect size for the four comparisons between smartphone intervention + standard intervention vs. the standard intervention-only arm was g=0.26 (95% CI: -0.09 to 0.61). A recent metareview of meta-analyses of digital interventions (19) reported that smartphone interventions for depression did not differ significantly…when tested as an adjunct to treatment (d = 0.26 [21]). The findings in the present report suggest that the effect size observed for Cue, when added to standard outpatient care in an academic department of psychiatry for patients with major depression, is substantially larger than those reported to date.…”