Mobile phone brief intervention applications for risky alcohol use among university students: a randomized controlled study

Abstract

BackgroundBrief interventions via the internet have been shown to reduce university students’ alcohol intake. This study tested two smartphone applications (apps) targeting drinking choices on party occasions, with the goal of reducing problematic alcohol intake among Swedish university students.MethodsStudents were recruited via e-mails sent to student union members at two universities. Those who gave informed consent, had a smartphone, and showed risky alcohol consumption according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) were randomized into three groups. Group 1 had access to the Swedish government alcohol monopoly’s app, Promillekoll, offering real-time estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) calculation; Group 2 had access to a web-based app, PartyPlanner, developed by the research group, offering real-time eBAC calculation with planning and follow-up functions; and Group 3 participants were controls. Follow-up was conducted at 7 weeks.ResultsAmong 28574 students offered participation, 4823 agreed to join; 415 were excluded due to incomplete data, and 1932 fulfilled eligibility criteria for randomization. Attrition was 22.7–39.3 percent, higher among heavier drinkers and highest in Group 2. Self-reported app use was higher in Group 1 (74%) compared to Group 2 (41%). Per-protocol analyses revealed only one significant time-by-group interaction, where Group 1 participants increased the frequency of their drinking occasions compared to controls (p = 0.001). Secondary analyses by gender showed a significant difference among men in Group 1 for frequency of drinking occasions per week (p = 0.001), but not among women. Among all participants, 29 percent showed high-risk drinking, over the recommended weekly drinking levels of 9 (women) and 14 (men) standard glasses.ConclusionsSmartphone apps can make brief interventions available to large numbers of university students. The apps studied using eBAC calculation did not, however, seem to affect alcohol consumption among university students and one app may have led to a negative effect among men. Future research should: 1) explore ways to increase user retention, 2) include apps facilitating technical manipulation for evaluation of added components, 3) explore the effects of adapting app content to possible gender differences, and 4) offer additional interventions to high-risk users.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov: NCT01958398.

Alcohol and disadvantaged men: A feasibility trial of an intervention delivered by mobile phone

“…For example, in smoking cessation studies, a higher frequency of texts can be sent around the date that a smoker has set for quitting 29. This is also important for interventions on alcohol use where the text messages can be targeted at heavy drinking occasions 30.…”

Smartphone Apps for Autism Spectrum Disorder—Understanding the Evidence

“…Apps based on principles like this are said to have indirect evidence to support them until direct evidence is obtained. But as previously mentioned, studies have shown significant discrepancy between evidence for a treatment modality in regular clinical settings compared to that in mobile device app setting (Gajecki et al 2014;Heffner et al 2015;Kertz et al 2017). Thus, precautions are warranted for indirect evidence as such discrepancy could lead to not only lack of efficacy but also potential harm to users (Gajecki et al 2014;Heffner et al 2015;Kertz et al 2017).…”

“…Assessing the evidence supporting ASD app is critical, as at least in other areas of psychiatry studies have shown a significant discrepancy between presumed benefit and actual clinical applicability or efficacy of apps (Gajecki et al 2014;Heffner et al 2015;Kertz et al 2017). Despite numerous apps claiming to be evidence-based, this purported evidence often refers only to evidence-based principles such as cognitive behavioral therapy which may or may not work equally well when delivered in a new digital format and app design (Fletcher-Watson et al 2016).…”

Realising the technological promise of smartphones in addiction research and treatment: An ethical review

“…BinDhim et al, 2014;Borland et al, 2013;Bricker et al, 2014;Buller et al, 2014;Haug et al, 2014;Hertzberg et al, 2013;Kirchner et al, 2013;Meredith et al, 2014;V. Patel, Nowostawski, Thomson, Wilson, & Medlin, 2013;Ploderer et al, 2014;Reitzel et al, 2014; Whittaker, 2011) Alcohol 12 (34.3%) (Bendtsen & Bendtsen, 2014;Dulin et al, 2014;Gajecki et al, 2014;Gamito et al, 2014;Haug et al, 2014;Kauer, Reid, Sanci, & Patton, 2009;Matsumura, Yamakoshi, & Ida, 2009;McTavish et al, 2012;Renner, 2012;Yu et al, 2012) Heroin 2 (5.7%) Epstein et al, 2009) Cocaine 1 (2.9%) (Freedman, Lester, McNamara, Milby, & Schumacher, 2006) General 3 (8.6%) (Campling, 2011;Ingersoll et al, 2014; Bendtsen & Bendtsen, 2014;BinDhim et al, 2014;Borland et al, 2013;Bricker et al, 2014;Buller et al, 2014;Dulin et al, 2014;Hasin et al, 2014;Haug et al, 2014;Ingersoll et al, 2014;Ploderer et al, 2014;Renner, 2012;Whittaker, 2011;Yu et al, 2012) Relapse prevention 3 (8.6...…”

“…Yet the security of this procedure is uncertain as it is possible for codes to be broken or cracked with modern computing methods (Wei, Murugesan, Kuo, Naik, & Krizanc, 2013). Although most of the apps that used encryption methods also de-identified the data collected BinDhim et al, 2014;Boyer et al, 2012;Gajecki, Berman, Sinadinovic, Rosendahl, & Andersson, 2014;Gamito et al, 2014;Renner, 2012;, collecting a wide range of data, including geo-location, renders it possible to construct a data profile that may identify the user (Gasson et al, 2011).…”