2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2034348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile phone camera benchmarking: combination of camera speed and image quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharpness, color reproduction, and noise have been regarded as the most important metrics of imaging quality (e.g., [62]), but no single metric exists that would depict the quality of a camera as a whole. Firstly, sharpness determines the amount of detail the imaging sensor can capture.…”
Section: Image Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sharpness, color reproduction, and noise have been regarded as the most important metrics of imaging quality (e.g., [62]), but no single metric exists that would depict the quality of a camera as a whole. Firstly, sharpness determines the amount of detail the imaging sensor can capture.…”
Section: Image Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this, we recognized that geometric means have been described as suitable averaging approaches to combine a wide range of measurements even without normalization [103,104]. For example, [62] used geometric means to combine camera phone image quality and performance metrics into one benchmark score. Similar to this, the point cloud colorization quality score per scan was calculated as a geometric mean of the selected quality metrics using the following Equation (1):…”
Section: Combining Metrics For a Quality Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation