2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006446
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Phone Radiation Induces Reactive Oxygen Species Production and DNA Damage in Human Spermatozoa In Vitro

Abstract: BackgroundIn recent times there has been some controversy over the impact of electromagnetic radiation on human health. The significance of mobile phone radiation on male reproduction is a key element of this debate since several studies have suggested a relationship between mobile phone use and semen quality. The potential mechanisms involved have not been established, however, human spermatozoa are known to be particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress by virtue of the abundant availability of substrates fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
273
1
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
12
273
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…47 This link is causative because if mitochondrial ROS generation is artificially triggered using rotenone to stimulate free radical generation at complex I of the electron transport chain, then the spermatozoa exhibit both lipid peroxidation and a loss of motility that can be reversed by the concomitant presence of an antioxidant such as a-tocopherol. 47 The stimulation of mitochondrial ROS generation can also result in oxidative DNA damage to spermatozoa, for example, when spermatozoa are irradiated with radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation 21 or when mitochondrial ROS is triggered after exposure to unsaturated fatty acids. 48 Thus, there is a plausible role for mitochondrial ROS in the etiology of DNA damage in human spermatozoa, although the factors responsible for stimulating free radical leakage from the mitochondria are still unresolved.…”
Section: Mitochondrial Ros and Apoptosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…47 This link is causative because if mitochondrial ROS generation is artificially triggered using rotenone to stimulate free radical generation at complex I of the electron transport chain, then the spermatozoa exhibit both lipid peroxidation and a loss of motility that can be reversed by the concomitant presence of an antioxidant such as a-tocopherol. 47 The stimulation of mitochondrial ROS generation can also result in oxidative DNA damage to spermatozoa, for example, when spermatozoa are irradiated with radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation 21 or when mitochondrial ROS is triggered after exposure to unsaturated fatty acids. 48 Thus, there is a plausible role for mitochondrial ROS in the etiology of DNA damage in human spermatozoa, although the factors responsible for stimulating free radical leakage from the mitochondria are still unresolved.…”
Section: Mitochondrial Ros and Apoptosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 Moreover, pre-exposure of human spermatozoa to antioxidants, such as melatonin or catalase, will prevent this apoptotic response. 53,54 Such an apoptotic cascade can also be precipitated by a variety of factors that induce oxidative stress in spermatozoa by triggering free radical generation by the mitochondria, including exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, 21 treatment with unsaturated fatty acids 48 and dosing with the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, wortmannin (Koppers AJ and Aitken RJ, unpubl. obs.…”
Section: Mitochondrial Ros and Apoptosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…de Iuliis et al In the study published by de Iuliis et al 17 in 2009, isolated and purified human sperm samples were exposed to RF-EMF at various SAR values up to 27.5 W kg 21 , well above the EMF and infertility A Lerchl 202 allowed exposure limits and clearly in the thermal range. However, some effects (lowered viability and motility, increased levels of reactive oxygen species and DNA fragmentation) occurred at levels of 1 W kg 21 , below the limits for localized exposure (Table 1).…”
Section: Impacts On Male Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%