2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile phones: A trade-off between speech intelligibility and exposure to noise levels and to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields

Abstract: When making phone calls, cellphone and smartphone users are exposed to radio-frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and sound pressure simultaneously. Speech intelligibility during mobile phone calls is related to the sound pressure level of speech relative to potential background sounds and also to the RF-EMF exposure, since the signal quality is correlated with the RF-EMF strength. Additionally, speech intelligibility, sound pressure level, and exposure to RF-EMFs are dependent on how the call is made … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors measured 0.9-3.8 V/m E-field strengths emitted by the mobile phone on a single time instance. However, it is known from literature that RF-powers emitted by a mobile phone can show variations of more than a factor 1000 during a call and that a mobile phone can dynamically switch emitting frequency (Thielens et al 2019;Joshi et al 2015), so the actual exposure level and frequency of the exposed group was unknown. The exposure of the sham group was never measured, while this group was exposed to environmental fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors measured 0.9-3.8 V/m E-field strengths emitted by the mobile phone on a single time instance. However, it is known from literature that RF-powers emitted by a mobile phone can show variations of more than a factor 1000 during a call and that a mobile phone can dynamically switch emitting frequency (Thielens et al 2019;Joshi et al 2015), so the actual exposure level and frequency of the exposed group was unknown. The exposure of the sham group was never measured, while this group was exposed to environmental fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from changing the habit of using mobile phones [5], not many studies provide practical solutions or physical devices to prevent the EMF emitted by phones. There are some products in the market that claim to prevent the EMF emitted by phones; however, most of them use a shielding method, which does not reduce the harm to human health [6]. Although the ICNIRP international guideline for phone radiation safety has been established, it does not reflect the actual EMF amount that can safely be absorbed by the human body [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different study methods, types of measuring equipment and means to carry them have been evaluated [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. For instance, the personal exposimeter has been carried in a bag next to the researcher's body [10,11,20], in a plastic basket on a bicycle [21,22], in a cardboard tube held above the researcher's head [23,24], on the top of a car or different ExpoM-RF devices have been mounted inside a box in a small car [25], or on a drone [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%