2011
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069x-10-59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile phones and head tumours. The discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epidemiological studies - how do they arise?

Abstract: BackgroundWhether or not there is a relationship between use of mobile phones (analogue and digital cellulars, and cordless) and head tumour risk (brain tumours, acoustic neuromas, and salivary gland tumours) is still a matter of debate; progress requires a critical analysis of the methodological elements necessary for an impartial evaluation of contradictory studies.MethodsA close examination of the protocols and results from all case-control and cohort studies, pooled- and meta-analyses on head tumour risk f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(233 reference statements)
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already published a more detailed comparison of Hardell's and Interphone protocols and results [39]. Moreover, the results of our meta-analyses confirm that to determine true risk of head tumours due to MP radiation it is vital to identify the laterality of head tumour localisation relative to the habitual laterality of MP use, in subjects with at least 10 year use or latency of cellular and cordless phones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have already published a more detailed comparison of Hardell's and Interphone protocols and results [39]. Moreover, the results of our meta-analyses confirm that to determine true risk of head tumours due to MP radiation it is vital to identify the laterality of head tumour localisation relative to the habitual laterality of MP use, in subjects with at least 10 year use or latency of cellular and cordless phones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In fact, the meta-analyses of Hardell [35,36], Khurana [37], Kundi [38], and ourselves [39], including the literature data on head tumours in people with MP latency or continuous use of at least 10 years -and thus, besides Hardell's data [1][2][3][4]36], also part of the Interphone data [23-25, 29, 31, 32] -show large and s.s. increases (100%) of the risk of ipsilateral gliomas with high level of malignancy, and sizable and s.s. increases (50-140%) of the risk of ipsilateral acoustic neuromas (Table 3). These increases are smaller than those found by Hardell in the pooled analyses of his data alone [1,2,4], being "diluted" with the Interphone data corresponding to the requirements indicated above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It points out that blind protocols gave positive results suggesting a cause-effect relationship between longterm mobile phone use and increase of ipsilateral head tumor risk. The non-blind protocols, however, gave negative results with systematic underestimation of such risks [3].…”
Section: Human Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis conducted by Levis et al [3] suggests that most studies conducted to uncover the health risk of mobile telephones were subject to methodological fallacy. It points out that blind protocols gave positive results suggesting a cause-effect relationship between longterm mobile phone use and increase of ipsilateral head tumor risk.…”
Section: Human Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…there are many studies stating a possible correlation between mobile phone usage and central nervous system tumors (16). however, one of the important points to be considered should be focused on whether radiofrequencies emitted from mobile phones affect the hearing system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%