2016
DOI: 10.3386/w22764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Phones, Civic Engagement, and School Performance in Pakistan

Abstract: Davis, and the Association for Education Finance and Policy for helpful comments. The view expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the findings of this study do not support some of the previous researches that used low-cost mobile technology. In a civic engagement program is Punjab that was utilized to regularly engage with autonomous school council members through scheduled calls via a call center, the cell phone calls did not increase the students' attendance (32) . In order to understand this contradiction, it is important to understand the context and nature of this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the findings of this study do not support some of the previous researches that used low-cost mobile technology. In a civic engagement program is Punjab that was utilized to regularly engage with autonomous school council members through scheduled calls via a call center, the cell phone calls did not increase the students' attendance (32) . In order to understand this contradiction, it is important to understand the context and nature of this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this “common trends” assumption is violated, the resulting estimate would be prone to bias (Angrist & Pischke, 2008). 8 One way to address these concerns is to construct a “naive” or placebo DiD using students who were never eligible for the program in any time period (Asim & Dee, 2016). When the common trends assumption holds for this naive DiD comparison, we can take the difference of the true DiD and the naive DiD to get a DDD estimate, which can then be interpreted as the causal effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evaluation of the program found that the SCMP increased enrolment of females, improved teacher attendance and improved school facilities (Asim and Dee, 2016). It also had a number of clear advantages over the one-off NGO-run capacity building sessions.…”
Section: Box 4 Using Information and Communications Technology To Sumentioning
confidence: 99%