Handbuch Verkehrspolitik 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-04693-4_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilitätsstile und Mobilitätskulturen – Erklärungspotentiale, Rezeption und Kritik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, bringing both spheres of transportation scholars (e.g., planning, infrastructure, built environment) and social sciences (e.g., political discourses, lifestyles) into play for researching mobility cultures aims for an interdisciplinary research approach addressing mobility. Building on the concept of mobility cultures, a number of studies started to identify (urban) mobility cultures and their characteristics [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Mobility Cultures As An Interdisciplinary Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, bringing both spheres of transportation scholars (e.g., planning, infrastructure, built environment) and social sciences (e.g., political discourses, lifestyles) into play for researching mobility cultures aims for an interdisciplinary research approach addressing mobility. Building on the concept of mobility cultures, a number of studies started to identify (urban) mobility cultures and their characteristics [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Mobility Cultures As An Interdisciplinary Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring the behavioral plane further, mobility is part of society's consumption behavior. This is not just in the transportation of goods that are expected to get delivered on the same day, but also in the expectation that wherever mobility leads, required and desired goods and services are immediately available and wants and needs associated with that are met (Götz and Deffner 2009;Götz et al 2016). The expectation to find the same goods at point B that are available at point A appears to be a given in Western understandings of mobility (Sheller and Urry 2006).…”
Section: Re-defining Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at practice examples where concepts of culture are connected to concrete cases or applied by civil society actors to projects, their definition has often been tailored to the specific field of application. Political strategies or policy measures of implementing mobility plans in a specific city or region are often assessed with reference to culture, even though what is meant by the term is not universally defined (Buba et al 2010;Deffner et al 2006;Götz et al 2016;Pucher et al 2010). Most prominently, mobility culture is referenced when talking about multimodality and mode choice (Klinger 2017;Klinger and Lanzendorf 2016) or improving access to specific modes of transport and traffic in specific regions, such as fostering a bicycle culture (Aldred and Jungnickel 2014;Carstensen and Ebert 2012).…”
Section: Movement: Fluidity As Common Denominatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individual factors include not only personal concerns of safety, but also access to information or physical restrictions. Furthermore, personal attitudes, values, and experiences influence mobility behavior considerably and can therefore account for individual mobility barriers [20,21].…”
Section: Mobility Behavior and Barriers To Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%