2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10624-009-9110-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilities and enclosures after Seattle: politicizing borders in a “Borderless” world

Abstract: This paper explores the complex and often contradictory ways in which state borders, and by extension territorial sovereignty, have become repoliticized over the past decade. In the 1990s, it was commonplace to describe globalization as auguring a new post-Westphalian world, one in which the nation-state and territorial forms of state sovereignty were disappearing. Both critics of and advocates for globalization made claims to a new ''borderless world'' and ''de-territorialization''-though from very different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suspicions of terrorism and immigration by 'less desirables' have reignited processes of 'securitisation' (Cunningham, 2007) in the contemporary crisis-laden world.…”
Section: Constellations Of Long-haul International Tourism From the Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspicions of terrorism and immigration by 'less desirables' have reignited processes of 'securitisation' (Cunningham, 2007) in the contemporary crisis-laden world.…”
Section: Constellations Of Long-haul International Tourism From the Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as tourism is concerned, perhaps the most concrete example of a counter trend is the world-wide tendency towards securitization (Cunningham 2007), following the September 11 attack on the US. This trend is motivated primarily by the threat of trans-national terrorism (particularly in the US), but also by the suspicions that foreigners might avail themselves of tourism as a ruse for illegal immigration (particularly in Europe).…”
Section: Obstacles To Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interrelations between borders and geopolitics has received attention from several perspectives, including securitisation (e.g. Cunningham, 2009;Huysmans, 2006;R. Jones & Johnson, 2016), embodied (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain forms of border‐crossing such as trade and tourism are often supported while in particular irregular migration – i.e., migration outside of formally regulated channels – is impeded, often very actively and even in militarised fashion, in many borderlands. As such, current selective bordering practices such as those introduced above are not simply last‐ditch attempts of nation‐states to cling to their regulatory role (Brown, 2010; Cunningham, 2009). They are active, historically produced political‐economic strategies underpinned by discourses on whose border‐crossings are legitimate (Bianchi et al, 2020) to reinvent and, hence, continue the role of nation‐states as the main regulatory format in globalising neoliberal societies (Beurskens & Miggelbrink, 2017; Jones & Johnson, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%