2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2009.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility extraction in SOI MOSFETs with sub 1nm body thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend can be physically explained by the freeze-out of the silicon dopants outside the GRC channel as reported in [13]. Moreover, for the UTB device, the extracted 0 values are similar to those expected in similar silicon based devices [14], while, for GRC device, the corresponding 0 values are found to be very low and are inconsistent with such kind of fully depleted SOI MOSFETs [15]. Consequently, this corroborates the influence of a series resistance in the GRC's case.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trend can be physically explained by the freeze-out of the silicon dopants outside the GRC channel as reported in [13]. Moreover, for the UTB device, the extracted 0 values are similar to those expected in similar silicon based devices [14], while, for GRC device, the corresponding 0 values are found to be very low and are inconsistent with such kind of fully depleted SOI MOSFETs [15]. Consequently, this corroborates the influence of a series resistance in the GRC's case.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Note that if at 300 K, the slope of the versus GS plot is 1 for 80 m/8 m, it is found to be much lower than 1 (0.58) at 77 K. This seems to indicate a temperature dependence of the limit case presented in (14). However, the slope of the versus GS is not critical issue for the parameter extraction method and is ignored.…”
Section: -Function Analysis In the Saturation Domain For Grcmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To make a fair comparison of the mobility in GNRs with that in Si, the following issue should be considered. Ultimately scaled Si MOSFETs need UTB SOI (ultrathin‐body silicon on insulator) channels or ultra‐small‐diameter Si nanowire channels to suppress undesirable short‐channel effects, and in these channels the carrier mobility is seriously degraded compared to bulk Si and Si MOS structures with thick or bulk body, see the last entries in Table .…”
Section: Preparation and Device‐relevant Properties Of Gnrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generalized scaling theory for the ATB field-effect transistor (ATB-FET) geometry however, has not been presented, which is different from the well established ultrathin-body (UTB) structures which have comparatively large body thicknesses with a well-defined semiconductor dielectric medium [7]- [9]. In this letter, a new generalized analytical solution is derived to calculate the electrostatic potential in the ATB-FET geometry which is applicable to transistors based on single-layer and few-layer graphene as well as conventional semiconductor materials with body thicknesses below ~ 1nm [10]. On the other hand, carrier transport properties will depend on the individual bandstructure of the specific material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%