Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6

Kong, Ki-Sik; Lee, Wonjun; Han, Youn-Hee; Shin, Myung-Ki; You, Hojun

doi:10.1109/mwc.2008.4492976

Cited by 277 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…La señal P-SCH se genera a partir de una secuencia de Zadoff-Chude de longitud 63 a la que se le ha eliminado e l elemento central (Soliman, 2009), (Kong, Lee, Han, Shin, & You, 2008). Se transmite utilizando las 62 subportadoras centrales del ancho de banda utilizado por el sistema, dejando sin ocupar la subportadora central o portadora DC.…”

Section: Sch (Synchronization Channel)unclassified

CAPA FÍSICA Y ALGORITMOS DE PLANIFICACIÓN DE ENLACE DESCENDENTE EN LTE Y WiMAX

Muñoz¹,

Blanco²,

Parra³

2017

RCTA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este trabajo presenta una revisión de la capa física y los algoritmos de planificación en LTE y WiMAX, como son BestCQI, PF y RR en la asignación de recursos para el enlace descendente o Downlink. Se presentan los principales criterios a tener en cuenta en los planificadores como la fairnessy el rendimiento, a partir del análisis de las tramas, subtramas, señalización y sincronización que componen la capa física de LTE y WiMAX. Finalmente se presentan las conclusiones de los tres algoritmos de planificación de recursos y se muestran las debilidades y fortalezas de cada uno.

show abstract

Section: Sch (Synchronization Channel)unclassified

CAPA FÍSICA Y ALGORITMOS DE PLANIFICACIÓN DE ENLACE DESCENDENTE EN LTE Y WiMAX

Muñoz¹,

Blanco²,

Parra³

2017

RCTA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As mentioned earlier, the mobility management protocol is classified into two classes: host-based and network-based depending on their goals. Designing these protocols, whether host-based or network-based should take into consideration their characteristics and the suitable environment [127]. Based on our classification, a comparison between the common characteristics of mobility management protocols are discussed as follows:…”

Section: Analysis Of Mobility Management Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mobility management for IoT: a survey

Ghaleb

Subramaniam

Zukarnain

et al. 2016

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Thing (IoT) or also referred to as IP-enabled wireless sensor network (IP-WSN) has become a rich area of research. This is due to the rapid growth in a wide spectrum of critical application domains. However, the properties within these systems such as memory size, processing capacity, and power supply have led to imposing constraints on IP-WSN applications and its deployment in the real world. Consequently, IP-WSN is constantly faced with issues as the complexity further rises due to IP mobility. IP mobility management is utilized as a mechanism to resolve these issues. The management protocols introduced to support mobility has evolved from host-based to network-based mobility management protocols. The presence of both types of solutions is dominant but depended on the nature of systems being deployed. The mobile node (MN) is involved with the mobility-related signaling in host-based protocols, while network-based protocols shield the host by transferring the mobility-related signaling to the network entities. The features of the IoT are inclined towards the network-based solutions. The wide spectrum of strategies derived to achieve enhanced performance evidently displays superiority in performance and simultaneous issues such as long handover latency, intense signaling, and packet loss which affects the QoS for the real-time applications. This paper extensively reviews and discusses the algorithms developed to address the challenges and the techniques of integrating IP over WSNs, the attributes of mobility management within the IPv4 and IPv6, respectively, and special focus is given on a comprehensive review encompassing mechanisms, advantages, and disadvantages on related work within the IPv6 mobility management. The paper is concluded with the proposition of several pertinent open issues which are of high research value.

show abstract

“…Recently, Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) was standardized in Internet Engineer Task Force (IETF) [7] [8]. This protocol to supporting mobility does not require the mobile node (MN) to be involved in the signalling required for mobility management.…”

Section: Proxy Mobile Ipv6 (Pmipv6)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) has been developed and applied successfully [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. The PMIPv6 protocol does not require the MN to be participated in the IP mobility signalling required for handover procedure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

PMIPv6 Assistive Cross-Layer Design to reduce handover latency in VANET Mobility for Next Generation Wireless Networks

AL-Hashimi

Hussein

2015

NPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

VANETs are one of the main next generation wireless networks which are envisaged to be an integration of homogeneous and heterogeneous wireless networks. The inter-networking of these wireless networks with the Internet will provide ubiquitous access to roaming network users. However, a seamless handover mechanism with negligible handover delay is required to maintain active connections during roaming across these networks. Several solutions, mainly involving host-based localized mobility management schemes, have been widely proposed to reduce handover delay among homogeneous and heterogeneous wireless networks. However, the handover delay remains high and unacceptable for delay-sensitive services such as real-time and multimedia services. Moreover, these services will be very common in next generation wireless networks. Unfortunately, these widely proposed host-based localized mobility management schemes involve the vehicle in mobility-related signaling hence effectively increasing the handover delay. Furthermore, these schemes do not properly address the advanced handover scenarios envisaged in future wireless networks. This paper, therefore, proposes a Logical Cross-Layer Optimization Block for VANET vertical mobility management framework utilizing cross-layer design, the IEEE 802.21 future www.macrothink.org/npa 1 Network Protocols and Algorithms ISSN 1943-3581 2015 standard, and the recently emerged network-based localized mobility management protocol, Proxy Mobile IPv6, to further reduce handover delay.

show abstract

Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6

Cited by 277 publications

References 14 publications

CAPA FÍSICA Y ALGORITMOS DE PLANIFICACIÓN DE ENLACE DESCENDENTE EN LTE Y WiMAX

CAPA FÍSICA Y ALGORITMOS DE PLANIFICACIÓN DE ENLACE DESCENDENTE EN LTE Y WiMAX

Mobility management for IoT: a survey

PMIPv6 Assistive Cross-Layer Design to reduce handover latency in VANET Mobility for Next Generation Wireless Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About