Mobility, Migration, and Colonization

Kotsonas, Antonis; Mokrišová, Jana

doi:10.1002/9781118769966.ch9

Cited by 6 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is supposed the situation is not tackled in due time because it creates other social and ethical constraints as well, and adversely hinders the SDG achievement (Fletcher, Breitling, and Puleo, 2014;SI, 2016;Bognar, 2019). In recent population studies, growth effects showed that migration and environmental effects also emerged with the increase in population growth in the Asian region, which also affects the service delivery of public institutions (Kotsonas and Mokrišová, 2020;Bintliff, 2019;Segers et al, 2020). It examined the consequences of DPs, and population growth put immense pressure on the economic growth of the country (Kim and Han, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the policy has to match the needs of the general public as well so that it does not affect personal liberty and autonomy, which is, of course, important, such as the two-child policy amendment of China (Fletcher, 2014;SI, 2016). A recent trend of urbanization, migration, and energy consumption also disturbs resource allocation to public and social service delivery (Kotsonas and Mokrišová, 2020;Bintliff, 2019).…”

Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Nexus Between Governance and Socioeconomic Factors on Public Service Fragility in Asian Economies

Abbas

Gillani

Ullah

et al. 2020

Social Science Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis article examines the impact of internal factors such as governance and state fragility on institutional quality in terms of public service fragility (PSF) in Asian economies.MethodThis study used the PSF as dependent variables in Asian economies from 2008 to 2018 and applied a two‐step generalized method of moment estimation; government effectiveness (GE), regulatory control (RC), demographic pressure (DP), and Human Capital Index (HCI) as explanatory variables, with population growth and GDP growth rate as control variables.ResultsThe results show that DPs have significant impacts on PSF, while GE, RC, and efficient human capital utilization have insignificant impacts on PSF.ConclusionBased on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that DP has a significant impact on public service delivery in Asia compared to other socioeconomic factors. However, with the implication of effective governance policies and by maximum human capital utilization, public services can be improved.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nexus Between Governance and Socioeconomic Factors on Public Service Fragility in Asian Economies

Abbas

Gillani

Ullah

et al. 2020

Social Science Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…That is to say, this is the first time in the history of the Mediterranean basin that some of its inhabitants-namely Tyrian "Phoenicians" reaching Gibraltar-had a panoptic, itinerant conception of the sea as a whole in addition to connections between particular places that were sustained over generations. Even if archaeological and historical sources seem not to agree on what happened or how, one thing is clear: the more we learn about this period, the more we see people on the move, not only in Greece but also all around it (see, e.g., Molloy 2016;Kotsonas and Mokrišová 2020). Sherratt and Sherratt (1993, 361-63) list a number of major developments that differentiate the first millennium from the second in the eastern Mediterranean: mercantile city-states replaced palace-states; iron production undercut centralized economies that flourished previously by controlling bronze making; new forms of political power came from economic shifts; tensions grew between agrarian and commercial interests; trading stations arose outside the "urban" world of the eastern Mediterranean; notions of political boundaries changed in response to the growth of sea trade; the spread of literacy highlighted ethnic differences; slave trade grew in volume and extent; demand for precious metals as economic currency increased.…”

Section: Transforming Village Societies Mobilit Y Migr Ation and Medi...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These population movements were used by ancient authors to explain the distribution of the three principal dialect groups of the ancient Greek language-Dorian, Ionic, and Aeolic-and are therefore usually in the domain of historians or historical linguists. Such themes are only rarely treated by archaeologists, not least because there is little archaeological evidence to support claims of large-scale migration, leading some to describe these and other migratory groups as "literary phantoms" (Papadopoulos 1997; see also Hall 1997;Mac Sweeney 2017;Kotsonas and Mokrišová 2020). Nonetheless, mobility and migration clearly form a part of Greek historical consciousness, which may also have extended back into preand protohistory.…”

Section: Literary Phantoms or Historical Migrations?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Societies in Transition in Early Greece

Knodell¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IllustrationsFIGURES 1. Nested (but often overlapping) scales of social and spatial units 20 2. Line graph and table of number of sites by period, by region, in central Greece 44 3. Comparative sizes of Mycenaean palaces 72 4. Some lesser-known tholoi of central Greece 87 5. LH IIIC pottery with seafaring, siege, and feasting scenes 130 6. Toumba building and cemetery at Lefkandi 163 7. Examples of Geometric pottery with early writing and figural scenes 221 MAPS xiv Preface and Acknowledgementsto the Mediterranean? How can archaeological analysis cross these scales? How do the trajectories of early Greek societies relate to those of other human groups (or not)? These questions are necessarily broad, and in this book I have aimed to address them in a way that will resonate with archaeologists interested in other parts of the world as well. With this in mind, I set out to write an archaeological history relevant to people working in a variety of disciplinary traditions-archaeologists and historians of ancient Greece, as well as anthropological archaeologists concerned with the broader archaeology of complex societies.The arguments in this book are built on the achievements of generations of previous scholars. I hope to do justice to their work in discussing it here, incorporating it into new analyses or visualizations, or reframing it in new interpretations. Even if I am in occasional disagreement with these scholars, I have tremendous respect for the efforts of fieldwork, interpretation, and publication that have allowed for the type of synthesis presented here. This book deals with a broad range of evidence and ideas, and it is inevitable that I have gotten some of it wrong. There are certainly sites, discoveries, or interpretations that I have overlooked, and the relevant dataset is ever evolving. Nevertheless, I hope to have provided some new insights concerning early Greece and the Mediterranean world, in ways that will be useful to other scholars as well.My interests in early Greece and the archaeology of complex societies were fos-

show abstract

“…This is in part connected to an unusual feature of the region, which suffered a less pronounced impact of the LBA collapse than many other areas. Many Ionian BA settlements, such as Liman Tepe/Klazomenai and Ephesos, continued to be occupied, while some might have had short breaks in occupation, even coupled with a period of changing political allegiances, such as Miletos (Kerschner 2006; Lemos 2007; Ersoy 2007; Niemeier 2007; Mac Sweeney 2017; Kotsonas and Mokrišová 2020). While the material evidence that can shed light on the transitional LBA to EIA period is increasing, much of the archaeological material remains obscured by taphonomic processes and environmental and landscape changes (e.g., Brückner et al 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tradition and Innovation in Aegean Iron Technologies: A View From Early Iron Age Ionia

Mokrišová

Verčík

2022

Annu. Br. Sch. Athens

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues that Ionia, located in the central part of western Anatolia, was one of key areas of metallurgical innovation in the Aegean during the transitional period from the Late Bronze to the Early Iron Age. Recent evidence from this region challenges the established narrative that envisions a rather consistent diffusion of iron technologies from Cyprus arriving predominantly via the western part of the Aegean region. This contribution provides a new understanding of the spread of iron technologies in the Aegean by paying particular attention to the social context of technological change and by stressing the need for regional approaches within the Aegean. Crucially, it reassesses the latest evidence from central western Anatolia, and contextualises it within the key cultural, social and technological axes of continuity and change between the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age. This study complements the recent methodological discussions related to the integration of bronze and iron technologies that foreground regional perspectives and pay attention to local knowledge-scapes.

show abstract

Mobility, Migration, and Colonization

Cited by 6 publications

References 64 publications

Nexus Between Governance and Socioeconomic Factors on Public Service Fragility in Asian Economies

Nexus Between Governance and Socioeconomic Factors on Public Service Fragility in Asian Economies

Societies in Transition in Early Greece

Tradition and Innovation in Aegean Iron Technologies: A View From Early Iron Age Ionia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About