1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf02670359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of martensitic interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters pˆ0:5 and bˆ1:5 in equation (A 13) are predicted theoretically (Kocks et al 1975, Grujicic et al 1985 for the interaction of interfacial dislocations with the strain ®eld of solute atoms. These parameters allowed the best ®t of experimental data for normalized activation energy versus normalized driving force for a number of steels (Ghosh and Olson 1994).…”
Section: …7 †mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameters pˆ0:5 and bˆ1:5 in equation (A 13) are predicted theoretically (Kocks et al 1975, Grujicic et al 1985 for the interaction of interfacial dislocations with the strain ®eld of solute atoms. These parameters allowed the best ®t of experimental data for normalized activation energy versus normalized driving force for a number of steels (Ghosh and Olson 1994).…”
Section: …7 †mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…must be prescribed. The theoretical form of the martensitic interface mobility has to be derived through an extension of thermally activated deformation theory, and experimentally veri®ed in single-interfac e experiments in thermoelastic systems (Grujicic, Olson and Owen 1985). Mobility parameters for non-thermoelasti c ferrous alloys have been determined by interpreting isothermal nucleation kinetics in terms of interface-controlled barrierless heterogeneous nucleation (Olson and Cohen 1986).…”
Section: …7 †mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing, α X ≈ 1 should reflect a less intense feedback from the relaxation of the transformation strains. We propose that α X ≈ 1 stems from stress-accommodating micro-domains within the martensite unit 14,39,42 as well as from slip during the motion of the martensite-austenite interface [43][44][45] .…”
Section: The Autocatalytic Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimizing interphase misfit is important for maximizing driving force for precipitation to increase finescale particle number density. Additionally, large coherency strains can be an obstacle for martensite interface motion during phase transformation, increasing interfacial frictional work and transformation hysteresis [10], which is detrimental to actuator applications with narrow temperature ranges. Lastly, early coherency loss during particle growth and coarsening would prohibit dislocation cutting and cause premature bypass, leading to non-optimal peak strength values [11].…”
Section: Design Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%