2017
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1280596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of nanofiber, nanorod, and straight-chain nanoparticles in gases

Abstract: With the fast development of nanotechnology, accurate measurement and classification of nanoparticles are in great need. Nanoparticles frequently appear in non-spherical forms such as long aspect ratio nanofibers, nanotubes, and irregular nano-agglomerates. While the welldeveloped classical studies were mainly in continuum regime with spherical particles, dynamics of the non-spherical nanoparticles is not fully understood. In this study, orientation-averaged mobility of nanofiber and nanorod (with no preferred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conventional overgrowth-based systems, the strategy was to grow Ag on the outer surfaces of a seed. , To compare the efficiencies of these two different strategies in tuning LSPR properties, we designed a set of experiments. Specifically, ∼ 58 nm Au nanospheres (Figure S12a) and ∼37 × 90 nm Au nanorods (Figure S13a) that have similar surface areas as the inner surfaces of 48 nm Ag–Au cages (Figure b) and similar volume equivalent diameters (which is defined as the diameter for a sphere with the same volume as a particle with a nonspherical shape , ) as the cages were prepared. These three types of seeds with similar extinction intensities were grown with the same amounts of Ag through the reduction of AgNO 3 by AA (see details in Figure a and Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional overgrowth-based systems, the strategy was to grow Ag on the outer surfaces of a seed. , To compare the efficiencies of these two different strategies in tuning LSPR properties, we designed a set of experiments. Specifically, ∼ 58 nm Au nanospheres (Figure S12a) and ∼37 × 90 nm Au nanorods (Figure S13a) that have similar surface areas as the inner surfaces of 48 nm Ag–Au cages (Figure b) and similar volume equivalent diameters (which is defined as the diameter for a sphere with the same volume as a particle with a nonspherical shape , ) as the cages were prepared. These three types of seeds with similar extinction intensities were grown with the same amounts of Ag through the reduction of AgNO 3 by AA (see details in Figure a and Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a randomized distribution of fiber orientation in the simplified Eulerian-Lagrangian (E-L) approach, shearinduced lift and Brownian diffusion force were frequently calculated by using the formulas of volume-equivalent spherical particles in literature. Using the fiber mobility equivalent sphere, Tian et al (2017) studied the fiber dispersion in inertial and high Knudsen number flows. Based on their study, an aerodynamic (or Stokes diameter) for the inertia flow and a surface equivalent diameter (or projected surface equivalent) diameter for the high Knudsen number flow should be used to characterize the fiber motion, respectively.…”
Section: Shear-induced Lift and Brownian Diffusion Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of the equivalent Stokes diameters, the deposition results of the nanofibers correlated closely to the Peclet number. Tian et al ( , 2017 presented a detailed comparison of the various equivalent diameters in characterizing nanofiber dynamics. While they identified the surface dominated transport mechanisms as most pertinent to the high Knudsen number flows, the application of these findings to deposition in tracheobronchial airways has yet to be reported.…”
Section: Summary and Future Research Needmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The is the Cunningham correction factor of the spherical nanoparticles. The modified Cunningham correction factors for cylindrical (MWCNT) and thin-disc (GNP)-shaped nanoparticles are given in Equations(49) and (50)[56], respectively.= 3 [ (2 ) − 0.72] 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%