2008
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of shear thinning viscous drops in a shear Newtonian carrying flow using DR‐BEM

Abstract: SUMMARYThe study of drop behaviour has attracted great interest in the last years due to its importance in different industrial and biological systems. Most available works focus on Newtonian drops, excluding some very important applications such as polymer mixing. Simulations of non-Newtonian drops have had only limited study, mostly in time-dependent rheologies or simple flow cases. This work presents a boundary-only formulation based on the dual reciprocity method to model the motion and deformation of non-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the Hamilton-Crosser model (which has shown good behaviour for Al 2 O 3 /water nanofluids [9]), this increase in concentration roughly translates to a 0.6% higher effective thermal conductivity in the neighbourhood of the wall when compared with the values expected from the same model for a homogeneous concentration of 1.05%. One possible explanation for the increase in concentration in this case is that the shear in the fluid causes the particles to cross over each other continually, creating self-difussion patterns [26]. Given that the top particles are moving faster, the downward motion of the lower particles accumulates over the multiple passes of particles located above them, pushing them down until the electrical repulsion of the wall avoids any further downward motion, and thus accumulating at a small distance away from the wall as seen in the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the Hamilton-Crosser model (which has shown good behaviour for Al 2 O 3 /water nanofluids [9]), this increase in concentration roughly translates to a 0.6% higher effective thermal conductivity in the neighbourhood of the wall when compared with the values expected from the same model for a homogeneous concentration of 1.05%. One possible explanation for the increase in concentration in this case is that the shear in the fluid causes the particles to cross over each other continually, creating self-difussion patterns [26]. Given that the top particles are moving faster, the downward motion of the lower particles accumulates over the multiple passes of particles located above them, pushing them down until the electrical repulsion of the wall avoids any further downward motion, and thus accumulating at a small distance away from the wall as seen in the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%