2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of sub-Saharan Africa doctoral graduates from South African universities—A tracer study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the tracer study confirm its robustness and value. The preliminary results reported in Kahn et al (2019) are confirmed with a higher confidence level and are extended to address issues of policy relevance. Given the difficulty associated with access, and obtaining contact information, there was little prospect of conducting a nonresponse follow-up survey.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the tracer study confirm its robustness and value. The preliminary results reported in Kahn et al (2019) are confirmed with a higher confidence level and are extended to address issues of policy relevance. Given the difficulty associated with access, and obtaining contact information, there was little prospect of conducting a nonresponse follow-up survey.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The MOTHS study was conducted over the 4 years 2016-2019 and, despite numerous obstacles, was able to develop a robust methodology to track and trace doctoral graduates through the complete cycle from country of origin to host university and future employment (Kahn et al, 2019). A now larger realized sample allows for the exploration of a number of additional dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers of the benefits and losses of intellectual migration, including academic mobility, being aware of the existence of close links between migratory loss of intelligence and the level of economy innovation, tend to focus their research on mitigating the negative effects on donor countries through positive effects in the form of a transfer (Beech, 2019;Kalantaryan & Salamońska, 2019;Teichler, 2017), on emphasising the benefits of changing the brain gain processes in terms of brain circulation and diffusion of knowledge (Rashidi-Kollmann & Pyka, 2016;Solimano, 2016;Kahn et al 2019), including the use of national academic diasporas sources (Amagoh & Rahman, 2016). Asymmetry of losses of intellectual potential of youth, including inventors, is evident even within the EU, where the gap in economic and innovation development is not so tangible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results show that a set of studies focused on destination countries [143][144][145] raises the necessity of a change of approach since these types of studies were initially raised based on the loss of advanced intellectual capital in the countries of origin. However, studies are currently rethinking their orientation to brain gain [12,[145][146][147][148][149], and to ideas of migratory dynamics presented in the brain circulation [12,47,146,147,[150][151][152][153][154]. Results emphasize that policies and efforts need to change if policymakers look at researchers' brain drain concept use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%