1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00683467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility of the3He solid-liquid interface: Experiment and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next section, we modify a GK approach for interfacial transport proposed by Puech et al [25], and apply it to a simple mass-mismatch LJ interface. A GK approach may be advantageous over the direct method as its equilibrium nature ensures a uniform system temperature.…”
Section: Interface Thermal Resistance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the next section, we modify a GK approach for interfacial transport proposed by Puech et al [25], and apply it to a simple mass-mismatch LJ interface. A GK approach may be advantageous over the direct method as its equilibrium nature ensures a uniform system temperature.…”
Section: Interface Thermal Resistance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Puech et al [25] suggest that the thermal resistance of the interface between materials A and B can be predicted using the Green-Kubo formula…”
Section: Planar Flux Green-kubo Formula For the In-terface Thermal Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the GF method, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can straightforwardly describe the inelastic effects through the anharmonic interatomic forces used in integrating the classical equations of motion [12]. * kimmo.saaskilahti@aalto.fi † sebastian.volz@ecp.fr MD is, however, directly suitable only for calculating the total interfacial thermal resistance [13][14][15][16][17][18], which cannot give a detailed, spectrally resolved picture of energy transfer processes at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…l K is simply the thickness of material (1) equivalent to the interface from a thermal point of view (see figure 1). The Kapitza resistance has been mostly studied in the case of superfluid Helium in contact with a solid, or in the case of grain boundaries between pure crystals [6,7]. In both cases λ is large, so that the Kapitza length is large and measurable effects can be expected.…”
Section: Introduction: Bulk and Interfacial Transport Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%