2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobilization of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells for Autologous Transplantation Using Pegfilgrastim and Plerixafor: Efficacy and Cost Implications

Abstract: Filgrastim (FIL) is the most common growth factor combined with plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization, but requires daily, multi-injection administration. We adopted a standardized mobilization regimen with pegfilgrastim (PEG) and upfront plerixafor, allowing for a single injection given the long half-life and slow elimination of PEG. Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 235 patients with lymphoma or plasma cell dyscrasias underwent mobilization with PEG 6 mg on day 1 and upfront pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 54 , 55 Moreover, lower cost was mentioned in cost-simulation analyses in patients with upfront stem cell mobilization with plerixafor compared to G-CSF. 56 , 57 More studies are warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of plerixafor.…”
Section: Use Of Plerixafor For Autologous Sctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 54 , 55 Moreover, lower cost was mentioned in cost-simulation analyses in patients with upfront stem cell mobilization with plerixafor compared to G-CSF. 56 , 57 More studies are warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of plerixafor.…”
Section: Use Of Plerixafor For Autologous Sctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partanen A et al [ 17 ] reported that HSC collection was safe and effective in 92% of NHL patients after mobilization with pegfilgrastim combined with plerixafor and chemotherapy. A study by Watts NL et al [ 5 ] showed that the success rate of pegfilgrastim combined with plerixafor was as high as 95%. Among the patients mobilized with plerixafor in this study, the mobilization success rate was 82.6% in the mecapegfilgrastim group, which was not significantly different from that in the rhG-CSF group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high cost of plerixafor hinders its widespread use. However, Watts et al found that in the autologous context, plerixafor was not associated with increased cost when mobilizing with G-CSF, due to the reduction in the number of aphesis and G-CSF doses [72]. Andritsos et al reported 241 myeloma patients mobilized with upfront plerixafor, where enhanced collection efficiency, with most patients achieving collection in 1 day, resulted in cost savings [73].…”
Section: Research Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%