Mobilization vs. Demobilization Discourses on Social Media

Abstract

While scholarly attention has been devoted to social media's potential mobilizing function, they may also contribute to demobilization discourses: social communication actively promoting nonvoting. This paper examines discourses around mobilization vs. demobilization in the context of the municipal elections in Jerusalem. As the sweeping majority of East Jerusalem Palestinians have continuously been boycotting Jerusalem's municipal elections, this is a potent case through which to examine how demobilization functions in action, through social media conversations. Using a mixed-methods analysis of Twitter contents as structured by different languages, our findings show how mobilization and demobilization discourses can co-occur during the same election event. Users of different languages-reflecting different social and political identities-interpret the elections in contrasting ways, with tangible implications for (in)equality in political participation. The study thus contributes theoretically to several domains of political communication, including election studies, local politics, and language fragmentation in online political discourse.

After State Repression: Movement Abeyance in Hong Kong under the Enforcement of the National Security Law

“…Lee et al, 2020). As mentioned by Kligler-Vilenchik et al (2020) abeyance has seldom been studied in the context of social media which is a central locus for the construction of meaning and the formation of political opinions. In today's media environment, social media combines and reshapes both interpersonal communication and mainstream media communication for the purpose of voicing and negotiating political views (Chadwick, 2013).…”

A big-data analysis of the communication patterns of parliament members with the public on Facebook: top-down, non-inclusive and non-egalitarian

“…Israelis gain political knowledge and encounter political information and government announcements on social media during random activity, intentionally and unintentionally (Yavetz and Aharony, 2022). Social media serves for mobilizing users to engage in political activities, such as voting, but also for demobilizing users by disseminating active attempts to discourage voting (Kligler-Vilenchik et al, 2021). Not only is there heavy Facebook usage by the public, but Israeli political figures are also quite active users.…”

Machine Translation Vs. Multilingual Dictionaries Assessing Two Strategies for the Topic Modeling of Multilingual Text Collections

“…This inability of topic models to bridge linguistic gaps severely limits their applicability for the expanding field of comparative communication research (e.g., Heidenreich et al, 2019;Vliegenthart & Damstra, 2018;Baden et al, 2020). The problem especially haunts the use of topic models in the study of social media discourse, which frequently includes contributions in multiple languages united around a common focus and shared hashtags (e.g., Kligler-Vilenchik et al, 2020;Theocharis et al, 2016). As a consequence, the Babel problem is receiving increasing attention within and beyond the social sciences (Lucas et al, 2015).…”