1935
DOI: 10.2307/1363343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mockingbirds, Their Territories and Individualities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The House Finch, often positive for WNV antibodies, roosts and nests in loose aggregations within dense vegetation or under eaves of houses (Bergtold 1913, Hill 1993). In contrast, the Northern Mockingbird, which we found to have a seroprevalence lower than in the House Finch, aggressively defends its territory and therefore has a more uniform and sparse distribution (Michener and Michener 1935, Derrickson and Breitwisc 1992). This behavior does not protect mockingbirds from mosquito biting, but rather their evenly spaced distribution may make them more difficult for a mosquito to locate than a group of House Finches.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The House Finch, often positive for WNV antibodies, roosts and nests in loose aggregations within dense vegetation or under eaves of houses (Bergtold 1913, Hill 1993). In contrast, the Northern Mockingbird, which we found to have a seroprevalence lower than in the House Finch, aggressively defends its territory and therefore has a more uniform and sparse distribution (Michener and Michener 1935, Derrickson and Breitwisc 1992). This behavior does not protect mockingbirds from mosquito biting, but rather their evenly spaced distribution may make them more difficult for a mosquito to locate than a group of House Finches.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…An example of microgeographic allopatry in which males and females occupy adjacent areas of similar habitat is provided by the Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), where individuals of either sex hold solitary feeding territories during the nonbreeding season (Laskey, 1935:373;Michener and Michener, 1935). Similar behavior is displayed by the Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) (Miller 1931:148), the Redheaded Woodpecker (Kilham, 1959), and numerous other species.…”
Section: Allopatry Of the Sexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pine spacing may affect birds by changing vegetation characteristics that delay canopy closure and increasing sunlight availability to the forest floor (Bechard, 2008), but we observed few differences in vegetation cover among MSP treatments after year 1 (Lane et al, 2011). Therefore, birds may be responding to structure of the pines themselves, perhaps as physical boundaries or perches for delineating or defending territories (Michener and Michener, 1935).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%