2016
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.116.236000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modafinil Activates Phasic Dopamine Signaling in Dorsal and Ventral Striata

Abstract: Modafinil (MOD) exhibits therapeutic efficacy for treating sleep and psychiatric disorders; however, its mechanism is not completely understood. Compared with other psychostimulants inhibiting dopamine (DA) uptake, MOD weakly interacts with the dopamine transporter (DAT) and modestly elevates striatal dialysate DA, suggesting additional targets besides DAT. However, the ability of MOD to induce wakefulness is abolished with DAT knockout, conversely suggesting that DAT is necessary for MOD action. Another psych… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, R-modafinil also produced a greater enhancement of current widths in the SNc versus the VTA (Figure 6B; Two-way ANOVA, main effect of brain region F 1,26 = 9.748, P = 0.0044; main effect of concentration F 1,26 = 10.15, P = 0.0037, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for 100 μM R-modafinil P = 0.0041). This is consistent with a recent voltammetry study that described larger effects of (±)-modafinil in the dorsal versus ventral striatum (Bobak et al, 2016). By contrast, there was no indication of a region-specific effect of JHW 007 on the amplitude or width of iontophoretically-induced DA currents either during drug perfusion or during drug washout (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, R-modafinil also produced a greater enhancement of current widths in the SNc versus the VTA (Figure 6B; Two-way ANOVA, main effect of brain region F 1,26 = 9.748, P = 0.0044; main effect of concentration F 1,26 = 10.15, P = 0.0037, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test for 100 μM R-modafinil P = 0.0041). This is consistent with a recent voltammetry study that described larger effects of (±)-modafinil in the dorsal versus ventral striatum (Bobak et al, 2016). By contrast, there was no indication of a region-specific effect of JHW 007 on the amplitude or width of iontophoretically-induced DA currents either during drug perfusion or during drug washout (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Modafinil alters activation of front‐parietal control and dorsal attentional networks (Cera, Tartaro, & Sensi, ; Esposito et al, ) implicated in the cognitive processes that coordinate the pursuit of a goal (e.g., Chong et al, ). Neurochemically, modafinil could act although dopaminergic pathways (Bobak et al, ) or even adenosine receptor modulation (China et al, ) as has been a postulated mechanism for time on task and mental fatigue effects (Martin et al, ). Although modafinil–adenosine receptor interactions have only been shown in rat osteoblasts to date, research is continually uncovering its action in the brain providing numerous potential pathways for athletic enhancement (Vodovar et al, ; Wadhwa et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurochemically, modafinil could act although dopaminergic pathways (Bobak et al, 2016) or even adenosine receptor modulation (China et al, 2018) as has been a postulated mechanism for time on task and mental fatigue effects (Martin et al, 2018). Although modafiniladenosine receptor interactions have only been shown in rat osteoblasts to date, research is continually uncovering its action in the brain providing numerous potential pathways for athletic enhancement (Vodovar et al, 2018;Wadhwa et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. While preventing DA uptake by inhibition of DAT has been considered to be its primary mode of action, recently MOD has also been shown to activate phasic DA signaling, which is suggested to be an additional mechanism contributing to its clinical effects (Bobak et al, 2016).…”
Section: Correction Of Raw Fscv Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…evoked phasic DA signals(Bobak et al, 2016). The evoked signals are considered phasic-like because of their resemblance to the naturally occurring phasic DA transients associated with reinforcement learning and elicited by burst firing of DA neurons(Covey et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%