2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal analysis and damage localization in plate-type structures via TDD and PE methods based on the data of an integrated highspeed camera system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OMA and the SSI techniques served to assess the eigenfrequencies on the basis of the output data of the bridge's response to road traffic only [56]. Then, the Time Domain Decomposition (TDD) method [56,57] was implemented to determine modes of vibration corresponding to the estimated frequencies. Finally, verification with the Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) [58] proved the high degree of consistency between the modes obtained numerically and experimentally.…”
Section: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation Of Natural Frequencies...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OMA and the SSI techniques served to assess the eigenfrequencies on the basis of the output data of the bridge's response to road traffic only [56]. Then, the Time Domain Decomposition (TDD) method [56,57] was implemented to determine modes of vibration corresponding to the estimated frequencies. Finally, verification with the Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) [58] proved the high degree of consistency between the modes obtained numerically and experimentally.…”
Section: Experimental and Numerical Evaluation Of Natural Frequencies...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adopted spring stiffness, starting from their prediction through literature expressions, was identified through in situ tests that included the installation of a set of accelerometers and signal acquisition that served for the carried out Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) technique [26][27][28][29][30]. The experimental set-up, implemented for the field tests, is shown in Figure 5: (1) all control points were equipped with three piezoelectric high sensitivity (10,000 mV/g) accelerometers 393B12 PCB Piezotronics (wire connected), acting in three directions: (a) the frequency range of accelerometers was from 0.15 to 1000 Hz, (b) data sampling of the signal was 1024 Hz; (2) the measurement points, A1-A5 and B1-B5, were located (Figure 5) on the footbridge slab above each girder.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modal parameters of the footbridge were estimated based on the in-operation measurements, considering the auto and cross-correlation of signals [27]. The peak picking method [28] was used to estimate the natural frequencies, while the mode associated with each natural frequency was evaluated through the Time Domain Decomposition (TDD) method [30]. To avoid modes correlated with the same pole of system, the version of Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) called AutoMAC [31] was used, i.e., the set of experimental modes was verified in terms of similarity and orthogonality of eigenvectors.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations