SAE Technical Paper Series 2015
DOI: 10.4271/2015-24-2467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Analysis as a Design Tool for Dynamical Optimization of Common Rail Fuel Injection Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard fuel dosing control strategies, both for single and multiple injections, are based on the rail-mounted pressure sensor, which does not contain the information of pressure oscillations. Especially for pilot injections, when the requested fuel mass is very low (m inj ~ 1 mg/str) and DT < 2500 μs, the presence of the pressure oscillations modifies the second pulse injected mass, generating remarkable differences between the requested and effective total injected fuel [35,36,45]. Thus a fuel quantity FQC becomes crucial to manage gasoline PPC using a CR system, whereby the energy released by pilot injections plays a key role in ensuring the whole combustion process stability [14,15,16,17,46,47,48].…”
Section: Fuel Quantity Fqcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The standard fuel dosing control strategies, both for single and multiple injections, are based on the rail-mounted pressure sensor, which does not contain the information of pressure oscillations. Especially for pilot injections, when the requested fuel mass is very low (m inj ~ 1 mg/str) and DT < 2500 μs, the presence of the pressure oscillations modifies the second pulse injected mass, generating remarkable differences between the requested and effective total injected fuel [35,36,45]. Thus a fuel quantity FQC becomes crucial to manage gasoline PPC using a CR system, whereby the energy released by pilot injections plays a key role in ensuring the whole combustion process stability [14,15,16,17,46,47,48].…”
Section: Fuel Quantity Fqcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high flexibility performing multiple injections with CR systems, hydrodynamic effects, which are generated by the water hammer consequent to the injector nozzle closing after each injection, affect the actual quantity of fuel injected during the following injections [26,27,28,29,30,31,32], especially when the amount of fuel injected is very low (in the range of 1 mg/str) and the relative distance between injections is small (lower than 2000 μs). As widely discussed in the literature [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], due to the propagation of pressure waves, the mass of fuel injected during the second of two consecutive injection pulses may vary significantly (up to 50%) around the nominal value, producing negative effects on the gasoline PPC stability [25,37]. Thus a fuel quantity correction strategy is required to achieve accurate fuel injection management.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 This study uses a lumped-parameter approach to describe the dynamics from a hydraulic perspective. Ferrari and Paolicelli 40 also used this method to analyse a CR fuel system model. Figure 3 shows the simplified CR model and its connection with the injector.…”
Section: Rail Pressure Variation Analysis and Algorithm For High-pres...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-pressure hydraulic circuit of the tested CR fuel injection system (Figure 1 The high-pressure circuit of the CR system has been simulated by means of a linear time invariant (LTI), lumped parameter model, which was previously developed. 17 The injection apparatus has basically been schematized, from a hydraulic point of view, as a network of zero-dimensional chambers (cf. Figure 2 and also Figure 1) in which the pressure is supposed to be uniform and can only vary with respect to time.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%