2016
DOI: 10.9790/1684-1304040610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Analysis of Bridge Structure Using Finite Element Analysis

Abstract: The objective of the research study is to model a bridge with four different material using ANSYS software and to perform a modal analysis of bridge problem. For all four materials eight node solid element is selected and meshing is done individually for each modal. The material property of each material is selected as per literature database in ANSYS software. The modal analysis in ANSYS is performed to obtain the natural frequency and mode shapes of bridge to avoid the resonance of the bridge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the findings, there was an adequate supply of structural stiffness in the bridge model that was developed and evaluated. The findings of a reputable research support the viability of using GFRP profiles as the actual bridge superstructures for pedestrian bridges [25]. Z. Zheng et.…”
Section: Mohandas Et Al [2020]supporting
confidence: 55%
“…According to the findings, there was an adequate supply of structural stiffness in the bridge model that was developed and evaluated. The findings of a reputable research support the viability of using GFRP profiles as the actual bridge superstructures for pedestrian bridges [25]. Z. Zheng et.…”
Section: Mohandas Et Al [2020]supporting
confidence: 55%
“…The stress analysis was done by using the FE software (ANSYS-APDL). Similarly, Shinde et al [2] also suggested that the stress distribution evaluation using FE method is reliable and is comparable with theoretical results. The paper evaluated both the bending and contact stresses using Pro-E and ANSYS tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%