2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05449-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Identification of a Railway Bridge Under Train Crossings: A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BHM systems are usually designed based on the structural response observed on an a-priori FE model (Ye et al, 2020). Although model-based BHM approaches (Gonen and Soyoz, 2021;Gonen et al, 2023) can predict future bridges' structural response under idealized load scenarios, their use results unfeasible for real-time damage detection applications (due to the high computational resources and the relatively long simulation periods required). With the rapid surge and adoption of AI, a new BHM and damage detection paradigm have recently gained importance: the model-free, also known as data-driven, paradigm.…”
Section: Bhm Ai and Adasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BHM systems are usually designed based on the structural response observed on an a-priori FE model (Ye et al, 2020). Although model-based BHM approaches (Gonen and Soyoz, 2021;Gonen et al, 2023) can predict future bridges' structural response under idealized load scenarios, their use results unfeasible for real-time damage detection applications (due to the high computational resources and the relatively long simulation periods required). With the rapid surge and adoption of AI, a new BHM and damage detection paradigm have recently gained importance: the model-free, also known as data-driven, paradigm.…”
Section: Bhm Ai and Adasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BHM systems are usually designed based on the structural response observed on an a-priori FE model (Ye et al, 2020). Although model-based BHM approaches (Gonen and Soyoz, 2021;Gonen et al, 2023) can predict future bridges' structural response under idealized load scenarios, their use results unfeasible for real-time damage detection applications (due to the Frontiers in Built Environment frontiersin.org high computational resources and the relatively long simulation periods required). With the rapid surge and adoption of AI, a new BHM and damage detection paradigm have recently gained importance: the model-free, also known as data-driven, paradigm.…”
Section: Bhm Ai and Adasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, these methods leverage changes in structural modal characteristics before and after damage occurs, making them capable of detecting not only surface faults but also sensitive to interior damage. However, conventional vibration-based methods usually necessitate multiple sensors and specialized data collection systems tailored to specific applications [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The custom nature and associated costs of traditional SHM approaches often pose obstacles for large-scale monitoring initiatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%