2015
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.concur.2015.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modal Logics for Nominal Transition Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TSSs do not include syntax for binding (and neither does [14]). We plan to integrate the nominal transition systems of Parrow et al [24] in our calculus, which can accommodate binders in SOS specifications. With such an addition, we would like to make examples with the π-calculus and its variants as TSSs that can be sent/received.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TSSs do not include syntax for binding (and neither does [14]). We plan to integrate the nominal transition systems of Parrow et al [24] in our calculus, which can accommodate binders in SOS specifications. With such an addition, we would like to make examples with the π-calculus and its variants as TSSs that can be sent/received.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. A notion of nominal transition system was proposed by Parrow et al [19]. Nominal transition systems satisfy the requirements of transition systems with atoms naturally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical modal logic provided in that work is quite different from the classical variant of FM, obtained by removing the requirement that implication and box are preserved under reachability. Other work [Parrow et al 2017], introduces a more abstract classical modal logic characterising weak bisimilarities, that may be instantiated for the applied π -calculus [Parrow et al 2015]. The intuitionistic modal logic FM, in Sec.…”
Section: Comparison To Related Work On Labelled Bisimilaritymentioning
confidence: 99%