2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modality and redundancy effects, and their relation to executive functioning in children with dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though students with dyslexia had higher reading times, as expected, see, e.g., Roitsch and Watson (2019), audio-support affected both groups equally. This is in line with Knoop-van Campen and colleagues (2020) who also showed that audio-support in learning tasks increased study time in university students with and without dyslexia, but contrary to similar research in primary school children who became faster with audio-support (Knoop-van Campen, et al, 2019). The impact of audiosupport on reading times may change over time and possibly relates to reading proficiency.…”
Section: Reading Timesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Even though students with dyslexia had higher reading times, as expected, see, e.g., Roitsch and Watson (2019), audio-support affected both groups equally. This is in line with Knoop-van Campen and colleagues (2020) who also showed that audio-support in learning tasks increased study time in university students with and without dyslexia, but contrary to similar research in primary school children who became faster with audio-support (Knoop-van Campen, et al, 2019). The impact of audiosupport on reading times may change over time and possibly relates to reading proficiency.…”
Section: Reading Timesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Especially, because the modality effect was discovered to be valid for children with dyslexia (Knoop-van Campen et al, 2019), there is also a possibility that university students as a population have developed some strategies that allow them to effectively learn from on-screen textual information if the textual information is provided in a self-paced form. Another possible explanation would be that students with dyslexia spend more time learning from on-screen textual information than from audio information in a video, which was the case in the study by Knoop-van Campen et al (2019). In that case, more time spent on learning could contribute to diminished differences between website and video conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Only monolingual children were allowed to participate. Participants were from studies described in Knoop-van Campen et al (2018, 2019. Some of the children could not be included due to missing log file data as a result of computer malfunction (Knoop-van Campen et al, 2018: 20 children, 50% dyslexia, Knoop-van Campen et al, 2019.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the measures in these studies are not suitable for analyzing this relation due to the randomized-block design, which complicates the interpretation of learning outcome results in combination with low numbers of some of the navigation strategies. In addition, the knowledge questions used in the two primary school studies (Knoop-van Campen et al, 2018, 2019 were not the same. Future research may investigate the link between navigation strategies and learning outcomes by adapting the set-up to suit this aim.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation