2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11575-011-0101-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode Combinations and International Operations

Abstract: Abstract• An enduring characteristic of extant literature on foreign operation modes is its discrete choice approach, where companies are assumed to choose one among a small number of distinctive alternatives.• In this paper, detailed information about the operations of six Norwegian companies in three key markets (China, UK and USA) is used as the basis for an exploration of the extent to which, and how and why, companies combine clearly different foreign operation modes. We examine their use of foreign opera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars that critically observe market entry research are also calling for studies that extend the focal research subject and analyze MNEs that simultaneously operate within one foreign market with different organizational modes (Benito, Petersen, & Welch, 2011). From the perspective of IJV research, it would be interesting to know whether one can identify recurring combinations or pathdependent combinations and decisions, i.e., intertemporal interdependencies of market entry choices (Shaver, 2013).…”
Section: Deepening Foundations Regarding the Role Of Ijvs In Entry Momentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars that critically observe market entry research are also calling for studies that extend the focal research subject and analyze MNEs that simultaneously operate within one foreign market with different organizational modes (Benito, Petersen, & Welch, 2011). From the perspective of IJV research, it would be interesting to know whether one can identify recurring combinations or pathdependent combinations and decisions, i.e., intertemporal interdependencies of market entry choices (Shaver, 2013).…”
Section: Deepening Foundations Regarding the Role Of Ijvs In Entry Momentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as even the validity of seminal studies has been challenged and important deficiencies leading to inconsistent findings and limited explanatory power of distance have been highlighted (e.g., Shenkar, 2001;Harzing & Pudelko, 2016), future IJV research has to develop and to test new models (Shenkar et al, 2008). Especially with regard to international strategic alliances and in the light of mode combinations (Benito et al, 2011) it will be of interest whether these new constructs will be able to explain market exploitation modes better. Second, relating more than 50 years of IJV research to globalization trends, one may raise the question whether findings provided by early studies of cultural distance still apply?…”
Section: Institutions Matter For Ijvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backshoring "Re-concentration of parts of production from own foreign locations as well as from foreign suppliers to the domestic production site of the company" [30] [30]- [32] Backsourcing "[...] where companies who initially outsourced their IT decide to bring it back in-house." [26] "Production return relocation from an [...] external entity" [31] [26], [31], [33] De-internationalisation "Any voluntary or forced action that reduces a company's engagement in or exposure to current cross border activities" [34] [34]- [36] Insourcing "Insourcing is the practice of evaluating the outsourcing option, but confirming the continued use of internal IT resources to achieve the same objectives of outsourcing" [11] [11]…”
Section: Concept Definition Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous literature has accounted for the differences in these types of subsidiaries and how these subsidiaries differ in their location choices or sequence of foreign entry when internationalizing [18], studies comparing the differences between these subsidiaries in their foreign entry mode decisions have been less apparent [19,20]. The Uppsala model has explained that firms are more likely to establish sales subsidiaries before production subsidiaries when internationalizing because they aim to steadily increase their commitment or investments [18,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%