2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.235402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode coupling and interaction in a plasmonic microcavity with resonant mirrors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure I‐L show the magnetic field distribution of a solar cell containing dual NG structures, calculated under TM‐polarized illumination (see Figure I,J) and TE‐polarized illumination (see Figure K,L). The electromagnetic field distributions in the solar cell depend on the interaction between the SPR modes and photonic modes (in the active region) supported in the solar cell . Figure I‐L demonstrate the field interaction between the field diffracted from frontside GaN‐NGs and the field scattered from backside Ag‐NGs, at different incident wavelengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure I‐L show the magnetic field distribution of a solar cell containing dual NG structures, calculated under TM‐polarized illumination (see Figure I,J) and TE‐polarized illumination (see Figure K,L). The electromagnetic field distributions in the solar cell depend on the interaction between the SPR modes and photonic modes (in the active region) supported in the solar cell . Figure I‐L demonstrate the field interaction between the field diffracted from frontside GaN‐NGs and the field scattered from backside Ag‐NGs, at different incident wavelengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of varying the geometrical parameters of the frontside and backside nanogratings—on the absorption and short‐circuit current density of the solar cells—was studied. Moreover, the effect of a relative lateral shift between both the NGs (the frontside and backside nanogratings) on the performance of the solar cell was also investigated. In this paper, we demonstrate the advantage of having different periodicities of the frontside and backside NGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, strong coupling between plasmonic and photonic modes has been demonstrated in hybrid LSPR Fabry-Perot (FP) cavities making use of near-and far-field interaction. In these cavity-coupled systems, three distinct configurations were previously studied where the plasmonic element is placed inside [27,28], at the front end [29][30][31] and at both ends [32][33][34][35] of the cavity. In the first configuration, coupling is studied from a cavity-atom picture in quantum electrodynamics based on the coupled oscillator model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the model suffers from the limitation in estimating the coupling coefficient, which is kept as a fitting parameter [27,28]. In the second and third cases, coupling has been studied theoretically using the Fourier modal [29,32], scattering matrix [34][35][36], numerical finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method [30,32], and finite integration technique [33] as a function of cavity length. The presence of a cavity influences surface plasmon excitation constructively or destructively, resulting in strong LSPR enhancement or complete suppression [27,30,37] purely by far-field interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As known from the properties of resonantly coupled double meander layers [26], strong interactions occur between surface plasmons and Fabry-Pérot (FP) cavity modes and between the different surface plasmon modes at smaller cavity length. The system can be understood as an FPcavity with frequency selective mirrors (meander structures) with a cavity length of D spa [38]. Within cavity lengths where the two layers are weakly coupled (e.g.…”
Section: Double Meander Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%