2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode-I debonding of a double cantilever beam: A comparison between cohesive crack modeling and Finite Fracture Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This solution was revisited and extended to account for a finite length of the specimen and a trapezoidal CZM by Dimitri et al. ( 2017 ). de Morais ( 2013 ) proposed a solution for a DCB with prescribed rotations (loaded with moments) where the arms are modelled as Timoshenko beams and a bi-linear CZM is embedded at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This solution was revisited and extended to account for a finite length of the specimen and a trapezoidal CZM by Dimitri et al. ( 2017 ). de Morais ( 2013 ) proposed a solution for a DCB with prescribed rotations (loaded with moments) where the arms are modelled as Timoshenko beams and a bi-linear CZM is embedded at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will refer to the models with quasi-brittle crack as ‘cohesive crack models’ (CCM) (Dimitri et al. 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the 12 BCs defined by the relations (8), other 7 relations are required to determine all the unknown constants. These remaining relations are determined by substituting Equations (14), (16), (20)- (22) into Equation (3). More specifically, the following relations can be applied to evaluate the first six constants independently, namely…”
Section: Analytical Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, effective methods of prognosticating the occurrence of this hindrance are intensively researched. Four basic groups of fracture models are used in this research, namely continuous damage mechanics models, porous solid mechanics models, cohesive models and phenomenological models [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Application of the last group of models does not allow one to understand the mechanism of fracture, but facilitates the prognostication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%