2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode I delamination onset in carbon fibre reinforced SiC: Double cantilever beam testing and cohesive zone modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to determine the critical energy release rate for the mechanical properties of the SiC deposition. The critical energy release rate of carbon reinforced SiC matrix composite is reported to be 0.1–0.53 mJ/mm 2 [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Here, as shown in Figure 8 , the models with different critical energy release rates (0.05 mJ/mm 2 , 0.1 mJ/mm 2 , and 0.15 mJ/mm 2 ) are calculated respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to determine the critical energy release rate for the mechanical properties of the SiC deposition. The critical energy release rate of carbon reinforced SiC matrix composite is reported to be 0.1–0.53 mJ/mm 2 [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Here, as shown in Figure 8 , the models with different critical energy release rates (0.05 mJ/mm 2 , 0.1 mJ/mm 2 , and 0.15 mJ/mm 2 ) are calculated respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bending stiffness was adopted to evaluate the flexibility of monofilaments before and after modification, and the testing principle was a cantilever beam method. 26 In order to gain more accurate results, the testing parameters were selected after several trials. Moreover, the final result was expressed with an average value and a standard deviation of three replicates.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bending stiffness was used to represent flexibility of samples, and the test standard was according to cantilever beam method. 44 To achieve accurate results, test parameters were selected after several trials. Meanwhile, the final result was expressed with an average value and a standard deviation of 10 replicates.…”
Section: Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%