2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode-independent fuzzy fault-tolerant variable sampling stabilization of nonlinear networked systems with both time-varying and random delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1: for non-linear system (1) with abrupt faults and actuator faults (2) and (3), if Assumptions 1 and 2 are satisfied, the controller (41) with the state observer (15), and parameter adaptive laws (27) and (28), (33) and (34) and (42) and (43) can guarantee that all the signals in the closed-loop system remain bounded and the output error s 1 = y − y d converges to an adjustable neighbourhood of the origin. Moreover, the transient performance of the system output is guaranteed within the prescribed performance bound for all t ≥ 0 regardless of unknown non-linear faults and actuator faults.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1: for non-linear system (1) with abrupt faults and actuator faults (2) and (3), if Assumptions 1 and 2 are satisfied, the controller (41) with the state observer (15), and parameter adaptive laws (27) and (28), (33) and (34) and (42) and (43) can guarantee that all the signals in the closed-loop system remain bounded and the output error s 1 = y − y d converges to an adjustable neighbourhood of the origin. Moreover, the transient performance of the system output is guaranteed within the prescribed performance bound for all t ≥ 0 regardless of unknown non-linear faults and actuator faults.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a number of aircraft accidents have been caused by actuator failures, such as the horizontal stabiliser or the rudder being stuck in an unknown position, leading to catastrophic failures. Therefore designing a controller to accommodate such failures and maintain acceptable system performance is particularly important [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2: The first fault-tolerant controller configuration, given by (12)- (15), will guarantee that the tracking error e will be bounded.…”
Section: Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, FTC methodologies can be classified into two types: passive FTC methodologies and active FTC methodologies [6,7]. During the last decades, there has been significant research activity in designing and analysing the passive FTC methodologies for NCSs [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Passive FTC methods consider system faults as special uncertainties and take no additional actions in response to the faults, whereas active FTC methodologies can reconfigure the controller by using the real-time fault information provided by the fault diagnosis scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we need to utilize neural network technique [275,276] and [277] to deal with ill-defined dynamics systems and unstructured uncertainties. Actually, the precise knowledge of robots, the environments, and the operator, are difficult to acquire.…”
Section: 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%