2022
DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000002108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of Anesthesia and Bladder Management Following Orthopaedic Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A System Level Analysis

Abstract: Background: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a surgical complication more prevalent in children with neurodisability and associated with an increase length of hospitalization. Risk factors include pre-existing bladder dysfunction, type and duration of surgery, anesthesia medications, postoperative opioid pain management, and patient demographics. The purpose of this investigation was (1) to determine the frequency of POUR following hip/lower limb orthopaedic procedures in which epidural analgesia was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with recent publications regarding the overall POUR rate in children of 5% [ 11 , 12 ]. Our finding of longer UC duration postoperatively and higher incidence of UC re-insertion in the NMD population is consistent with that of Buckon’s [ 13 ] and Brenn’s [ 14 ] review of UC management in post-orthopedic surgery in children with cerebral palsy (CP). It is important to note, however, that re-insertion rates differ significantly between the studies (Buckon: 9.2%, Brenn: 70%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with recent publications regarding the overall POUR rate in children of 5% [ 11 , 12 ]. Our finding of longer UC duration postoperatively and higher incidence of UC re-insertion in the NMD population is consistent with that of Buckon’s [ 13 ] and Brenn’s [ 14 ] review of UC management in post-orthopedic surgery in children with cerebral palsy (CP). It is important to note, however, that re-insertion rates differ significantly between the studies (Buckon: 9.2%, Brenn: 70%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While both general and regional anesthesia have previously been implicated as contributing factors in the occurrence of POUR in children [ 13 ], current literature is still sparse regarding the occurrence of POUR in children treated with epidural analgesia [ 6 , 7 ]. Furthermore, recent publications on regional anesthesia in children focus mostly on major adverse events such as neurologic, infectious, or systemic toxicity in children treated with epidural analgesia, but do not emphasize the risks of POUR and/or peri-operative UC placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood of PoPD increased by over a third in patients with complex chronic conditions (CCC) if they used eleven or more medications. A subset of children with cerebral palsy (CP) can be described as having SNI, and the recent literature indicates that children with CP often have reduced overall health, in turn making them vulnerable to perioperative complications from anesthesia and surgical intervention [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Although there is scarce research on the impacts of anesthesia for children with CP/SNI, the Buckon study indicates that having an active health issue is a risk factor for PoPD and reinforces the need for further research that considers the unique preoperative physical, cognitive, and communication factors of children with SNI [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, the use of epidural anesthesia does complicate the timing of removal of a Foley catheter. An article examining bladder management after orthopedic surgery in children with cerebral palsy showed that an epidural increases Foley catheter duration [14]. The literature also suggests that removing a Foley before the epidural may be associated with urinary retention in pediatric spinal fusion [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%