1993
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/167.4.971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of Inoculation of the Lyme Disease Agent Borrelia burgdorferi Influences Infection and Immune Responses in Inbred Strains of Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
67
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
14
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is the fact that the two routes of spirochete inoculation, i.e. tick versus needle infection, lead to greatly differing courses of infection, induction of immune responses and onset of disease manifestations [23,25,55]. However, it is clear that only the natural mode of infection will uncover strategies of either spirochetes or mammals which are of biological significance and thus of relevance for the appropriate treatment of Lyme disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for this is the fact that the two routes of spirochete inoculation, i.e. tick versus needle infection, lead to greatly differing courses of infection, induction of immune responses and onset of disease manifestations [23,25,55]. However, it is clear that only the natural mode of infection will uncover strategies of either spirochetes or mammals which are of biological significance and thus of relevance for the appropriate treatment of Lyme disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the notion that needle exposure by no means reflects the situation of tick infection [23,25,54] and the highly improved real-time PCR technique to quantify B. burgdorferi in situ [24,27,43,46,48,62,63,64], we have now performed a detailed quantitative analysis of the spirochete burden and population dynamics in different tissues of mice following natural (tick) infection by B. burgdorferi s.s. (ZS7) for a period of 4 months postinfection (p.i.). For this purpose we have selected one cp26-encoded gene, ospC [40], and four previously described lp54-encoded genes, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among isolates from the Aarberg area (site 3), 83% expressed the 21-23 kDa proteins and 76% reacted with PoAb anti-22 kDa/NE4 and this was significantly different from the isolates from site 1. Several studies showed that these proteins are important immunogens which elicit the antibody response early after the tick bite [5,[17][18][19]. It remains to be elucidated whether these proteins could be responsible for the presence of asymptomatic seropositive people in Aarberg by eliciting a protective antibody response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their anatomic structure, the feeding apparatus of Ixodes ticks is adapted for imbibing accumulated tissue fluids from a cavity created in the skin of the host, 26,27 and dermal migration of spirochetes within hosts is suggested. 1,13,28 Our previous investigations also demonstrated that spirochetes can be acquired by the nymphal vector ticks as early as eight hours after tick attachment, and the efficiency of acquisition of spirochetes by feeding ticks was maximized (> 80%) at 48 hours after initial attachment of ticks. 14 Although differential acquisition of spirochetes by feeding ticks seems to be related to the span of time during which † Salivary gland extracts of unfed ticks (SGE0) or ticks that had fed on hosts for 2 days (SGE2), 4 days (SGE4), and 6 days (SGE6) were applied to the tops of the uninoculated sides and served as chemoattractant for inoculated spirochetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%