2019
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of miniaturisation influences body shape evolution in New World anchovies (Engraulidae)

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting this idea is the fact that Belonion matures at miniscule sizes (5 cm), has an elongated lower jaw but short upper jaw (observed in many subadult needlefish species; Lovejoy et al, 2004), and has lost or reduced both axial and appendicular skeletal elements (Collette, 1966). Overall, these findings suggest strong selection for reduced body sizes in Neotropical freshwater taxa (Weitzman & Vari, 1988) and multiple means by which that selection can effect changes (Bloom et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supporting this idea is the fact that Belonion matures at miniscule sizes (5 cm), has an elongated lower jaw but short upper jaw (observed in many subadult needlefish species; Lovejoy et al, 2004), and has lost or reduced both axial and appendicular skeletal elements (Collette, 1966). Overall, these findings suggest strong selection for reduced body sizes in Neotropical freshwater taxa (Weitzman & Vari, 1988) and multiple means by which that selection can effect changes (Bloom et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many pelagic marine fishes likely maintain larger size to migrate large distances, evade, or outgrow open‐ocean predators (e.g., tunas, billfishes, and sharks), and pursue elusive, strong‐swimming prey (Webb, 1984). Smaller body sizes and left‐skewed body size distributions of freshwater fish communities (Griffiths, 2012) appear to be a feature of both Neotropical primary freshwater fishes (Steele & López‐Fernández, 2014) and invaders of freshwater such as needlefishes, anchovies (Bloom, Kolmann, Foster, & Watrous, 2020; Roberts, 1984), pufferfishes (Santini et al, 2013), and stingrays (Carvalho, Rosa, & Araújo, 2016; Monkolprasit & Roberts, 1990). Our study provides additional evidence that selection toward size‐related adaptive peaks can be strong (Bloom et al, 2018; Burns & Bloom, 2020), possibly because body size covaries with many other phenotypic and life history traits (Romanuk, Hayward, & Hutchings, 2011), offering multiple selective surfaces (Peters, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the description of miniature forms and their adaptive relationships have been addressed since classical works by Haeckel 39 , current phylogenetic approaches might elucidate the tempo and mode of evolution in body size of species and/or lineages [40][41][42] . However, the few studies available based on molecular data involving the miniature genera Microphilypnus have generated contrasting evolutionary scenarios.…”
Section: Miniaturization In Eleotridsmentioning
confidence: 99%