Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Volume 2 - EMNLP '09 2009
DOI: 10.3115/1699571.1699578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model adaptation via model interpolation and boosting for web search ranking

Abstract: This paper explores two classes of model adaptation methods for Web search ranking: Model Interpolation and error-driven learning approaches based on a boosting algorithm. The results show that model interpolation, though simple, achieves the best results on all the open test sets where the test data is very different from the training data. The tree-based boosting algorithm achieves the best performance on most of the closed test sets where the test data and the training data are similar, but its performance … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gao and Wu et al [Wu et al 2008;Gao et al 2009] comparatively studied the model interpolation method, i.e., linear combination of the source domain model and the target domain model, and a gradient boosting method similar to our additive model, i.e., appending trees to the source domain model to minimize the target domain prediction error only. Geng et al [Geng et al 2009] formulate the adaptation problem in web search under the framework of quadratic programming and thus a method is similar to SVM can be applied.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao and Wu et al [Wu et al 2008;Gao et al 2009] comparatively studied the model interpolation method, i.e., linear combination of the source domain model and the target domain model, and a gradient boosting method similar to our additive model, i.e., appending trees to the source domain model to minimize the target domain prediction error only. Geng et al [Geng et al 2009] formulate the adaptation problem in web search under the framework of quadratic programming and thus a method is similar to SVM can be applied.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generality of these approaches is limited either by the type of queries or in the setting (traditional TREC style) they are explored. In [13], English training data from a general domain has been used to improve the accuracy of the English queries from a Korean market. But in this particular case both in-domain and out-of-domain data are from English, hence the set of features used for the learning algorithm remain same.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different flavors of this problem have been attempted by other researchers [10,11,12,13,14]. At a broader level, there are two possible approaches to transfer the useful information across languages depending on the availability of original queries in both the languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the possible ways to address the above challenge is to build LSP models that learn lexico-syntactic patterns on generic and ontology rich domains and then apply these patterns on specific ontology poor domains. In line with (Gao, 2009), we respectively refer as the background domains and application domains to these two kinds of domains. Yet, in machine learning and in statistical learning data should be enough representative of the environment where learned models will be applied.…”
Section: Generic Ontology Learners On Application Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Snow, Jurafsky, & Ng, 2006), all WordNet has been used as source of training examples. In this case, domain adaptation techniques must be adopted (Bacchiani, Roark, & Saraclar, 2004;Roark & Bacchiani, 2003;Chelba & Acero, 2006;Gao, 2009;Gildea, 2001).…”
Section: Adapting Semantic Network To New Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%