1984
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1984)110:2(149)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model and Production Function for Irrigation Management

Abstract: A simulation model was developed to estimate the effect of deficit irrigation upon crop yield. The model was designed to provide relative yield estimates for numerous combinations of irrigation system, crop growth and irrigation management parameters. A daily soil moisture balance was used to predict evaporation and transpiration from which crop yields were estimated. Gross irrigation water requirements were estimated from net irrigation requirements, irrigation efficiencies, irrigation system limitations, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stewart et al (1977) and Doorenbos and Kassam (1979) predicted relative yield reductions from the product of relative evapotranspiration deficits and a crop-specific yield response factor or yield reduction ratio. This approach has been used extensively to estimate relative yield from inadequate irrigation applications or shortages in water supply (Martin et al, 1984;Scheierling et al, 1997;Kirda et al, 1999;Raes et al, 2006;Shrestha et al, 2010). Relationships between crop yield and evapotranspiration may subsequently be used to develop crop water production functions that relate crop yield to the field water supply, which includes effective precipitation, stored soil moisture depletion, and irrigation amounts that account for spray droplet evaporation and water drift outside the target area, surface runoff, and deep percolation losses (Stewart and Hagan, 1973;Vaux and Pruitt, 1983;Howell, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stewart et al (1977) and Doorenbos and Kassam (1979) predicted relative yield reductions from the product of relative evapotranspiration deficits and a crop-specific yield response factor or yield reduction ratio. This approach has been used extensively to estimate relative yield from inadequate irrigation applications or shortages in water supply (Martin et al, 1984;Scheierling et al, 1997;Kirda et al, 1999;Raes et al, 2006;Shrestha et al, 2010). Relationships between crop yield and evapotranspiration may subsequently be used to develop crop water production functions that relate crop yield to the field water supply, which includes effective precipitation, stored soil moisture depletion, and irrigation amounts that account for spray droplet evaporation and water drift outside the target area, surface runoff, and deep percolation losses (Stewart and Hagan, 1973;Vaux and Pruitt, 1983;Howell, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin et al (1984) developed a method to estimate the necessary coefficients for commonly used production functions. The technique is based upon a linear relationship of yield to evapotranspiration (ET):…”
Section: Physically Based Coefficients For Crop Production Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these coefficients are determined from regression analysis of data from a specific experiment. Using the three conditions previously listed, Martin et al (1984) developed relationships between physical parameters and these coefficients for a quadratic, exponential, and power function used to describe the yield response ratio. Martin et al showed that using the physically based coefficients in the production functions represented experimental data as well as regression analysis results for data from Nebraska.…”
Section: Physically Based Coefficients For Crop Production Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations