Model and simulation on a shock test bed for gun breechblock system

Abstract

Abstract. In order to test the dynamic characteristics of the shock test bed for gun breechblock system expediently, the dynamic model was established based on the virtual prototype technology. The three-dimensional solid model of each part was established and assembled by software Pro/Engineer. Then the whole model was imported into the dynamic software MSC.ADAMS through the interface, Mechanism/Pro, between the two software. Then the constraints, contacts or spring force between each two parts were added in the model according to the relation in practice. The force outside was imposed on the bearing part. After that, the virtual prototype model was established. With the model, simulation was processed and the dynamic characteristics of the parts of the shock test bed were tested under different conditions. The test results show that the model is tallies with the physical prototype and can be used to analyze the dynamic characteristics of the shock test bed parts.

Shock Wave Characteristics of Hydraulic Shock Wave Simulator with Variable Damping

“…Matlab [16,17]. The constitutive models and optimization design of the rubber wave simulators were built by Yang et al [18][19][20][21][22]. The reports showed that the method using a mass block with high speed impacting cannon muzzle to simulate cannon firing process was proved to be a feasible recoil simulation test method [23,24].…”

Shock Mechanism Analysis and Simulation of High-Power Hydraulic Shock Wave Simulator

“…The simulation of dynamic recoil process was achieved via applying homogeneous experiment design and influence study of shock parameters using Matlab [7,8]. Yuliang et al carried out finite element simulations and test researches of constitutive models of the rubber wave simulators and conducted optimization design of rubber wave simulators [9][10][11][12][13]. Jiao et al analyzed shock wave characteristics of a hydraulic damper for shock test machine and achieved the influence of the annular gap, the diameter of the orifice pore, and the shock wave under different velocities [14].…”