2011
DOI: 10.1002/esp.2246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model based analysis of lateral and vertical soil carbon fluxes induced by soil redistribution processes in a small agricultural catchment

Abstract: Soil redistribution on arable land significantly affects lateral and vertical soil carbon (C) fluxes (caused by C formation and mineralization) and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. Whether this serves as a (C) sink or source to the atmosphere is a controversial issue. In this study, the SPEROS-C model was modified to analyse erosion induced lateral and vertical soil C fluxes and their effects upon SOC stocks in a small agricultural catchment (4Á2 ha). The model was applied for the period between 1950 and 2007… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if presuming that C e equals C d observed in topsoil of colluvial depositional sites (e.g., in van Oost et al, 2012), then the C d would lead to an overestimation of total SOC loss from eroding sites, because C d is likely enriched by SOC-rich aggregates compared to C e due to preferential deposition. Conversely, assuming C d corresponds to C e observed in topsoil at eroding sites (e.g., in Dlugoß et al, 2012) would neglect the potential enrichment of SOC in sediment fractions preferentially deposited on hillslopes. This would thus lead to an underestimation of C min during transport.…”
Section: Erosion As a Source Of Co 2 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if presuming that C e equals C d observed in topsoil of colluvial depositional sites (e.g., in van Oost et al, 2012), then the C d would lead to an overestimation of total SOC loss from eroding sites, because C d is likely enriched by SOC-rich aggregates compared to C e due to preferential deposition. Conversely, assuming C d corresponds to C e observed in topsoil at eroding sites (e.g., in Dlugoß et al, 2012) would neglect the potential enrichment of SOC in sediment fractions preferentially deposited on hillslopes. This would thus lead to an underestimation of C min during transport.…”
Section: Erosion As a Source Of Co 2 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net effect of soil erosion as a source or sink of CO 2 in the global carbon cycle has been the subject of intense debate (Lal, 2003;van Oost et al, 2007;Quinton et al, 2010;Dlugoß et al, 2012;Doetterl et al, 2012). On one hand, erosion exposes the previously incorporated soil organic carbon (SOC), which may accelerate the mineralization of eroded SOC (Jacinthe et al, 2002(Jacinthe et al, , 2004Kuhn, 2007;Mora et al, 2007;Lal and Pimentel, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.3: Representation of grain-size-specific soil and SOC). The parameters for the C turnover model are taken from Dlugoß et al (2012), who worked under similar environmental conditions with loess-derived soils in a small catchment in western Germany. The C turnover decline with depth was determined by an inverse modelling approach and found a mean turnover rate of 0.268 yr −1 for the young pool and 0.002 yr −1 for the old pool over the 1 m soil profile.…”
Section: Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…years to decennia) and agricultural landscapes. It includes spatially distributed water and tillage erosion and dynamically couples carbon turnover (Van Oost et al, 2005a;Dlugoß et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%