2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1723-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based contextualization of in vitro toxicity data quantitatively predicts in vivo drug response in patients

Abstract: Understanding central mechanisms underlying drug-induced toxicity plays a crucial role in drug development and drug safety. However, a translation of cellular in vitro findings to an actual in vivo context remains challenging. Here, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was used for in vivo contextualization of in vitro toxicity data (PICD) to quantitatively predict in vivo drug response over time by integrating multiple levels of biological organization. Explicitly, in vitro toxicity data at t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previously established multiscale approach PICD allows a quantitative description of drug-induced toxicity at patient level 14 (Figure 1) by coupling whole-body PBPK models ( Figure 2) with in vitro toxicity data from Open TG-GATEs, 28 an exceptional large-scale toxicogenomics database. In this study, PD responses were analyzed at 8 hours and 24 hours because in vitro response data for CAF had only been measured at these timepoints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previously established multiscale approach PICD allows a quantitative description of drug-induced toxicity at patient level 14 (Figure 1) by coupling whole-body PBPK models ( Figure 2) with in vitro toxicity data from Open TG-GATEs, 28 an exceptional large-scale toxicogenomics database. In this study, PD responses were analyzed at 8 hours and 24 hours because in vitro response data for CAF had only been measured at these timepoints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a major challenge of such in vitro experiments is the translatability to patients. Recently, we have developed an integrative multiscale approach called PBPK-based in vivo contextualization of in vitro toxicity data (PICD) 14 that allows the translation of such in vitro findings to an in vivo context by coupling in vitro toxicity data with whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models ( Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole-body PBPK models were initially established for a set of fifteen hepatotoxic drugs and were carefully validated with human experimental data from literature ( S3 Table ). The validated PBPK models served as input for PICD (PBPK-based in vivo contextualization of in vitro toxicity data) [ 20 ] to quantify in vivo drug responses induced by therapeutic and toxic doses administered in humans. Physicochemical properties, plasma protein binding, and lipophilicity of the different drugs and their metabolites were obtained from literature and were used to develop the reference PBPK model for intravenous administration in humans ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A severe drawback of such in vitro analyses, however, is often the limited translatability to the in vivo situation in patients in actual clinical practice. Recently, we have developed an integrative multiscale approach called PICD for the in vivo contextualization of in vitro toxicity data based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, which significantly supports translations to an in vivo situation in patients ( Fig 1 ) [ 20 ]. Importantly, PBPK modeling aims for a mechanistic representation of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) processes governing drug pharmacokinetics (PK) within the human body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated AUC was assumed to be equivalent with in-vivo AUC brain. Dose reconstruction approach has been used, so that the given equivalent oral dose will provide the AUC in the brain that matches the AUC for the 12 different in-vitro doses (6 for 24hr and 6 for 48hr), a similar approach has been used in the previous study (Thiel et al, 2017). The oral equivalent doses were estimated to be way higher, as the PFOS concentration reaching to the brain was found to be relatively very low (Fabrega et al, 2014;Fàbrega et al, 2016).…”
Section: Ivive For Dose Equivalencymentioning
confidence: 99%