2020
DOI: 10.1080/1463922x.2020.1711990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based development of a mental workload-sensitivity index for subject clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subject's normalized workload-sensitivity index s a was based on a linear model for the dependence of subjectively experienced workload as assessed by the ISA questionnaire and traffic load. In Fürstenau et al (2020), we showed that the linear model was able to predict the ISA value with a high confidence for means across the subjects and provided reasonable linear correlation coefficients for the individuals. Independence from the arbitrary ISA values was achieved via normalization by scales' means, i.e., (traffic load max + traffic load min ) / 2 for the traffic volume and (ISA max + ISA min ) / 2 for the subjective workload, resulting in anticorrelated (normalized) sensitivity and intercept s b = 1 − s a .…”
Section: Subjective Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Subject's normalized workload-sensitivity index s a was based on a linear model for the dependence of subjectively experienced workload as assessed by the ISA questionnaire and traffic load. In Fürstenau et al (2020), we showed that the linear model was able to predict the ISA value with a high confidence for means across the subjects and provided reasonable linear correlation coefficients for the individuals. Independence from the arbitrary ISA values was achieved via normalization by scales' means, i.e., (traffic load max + traffic load min ) / 2 for the traffic volume and (ISA max + ISA min ) / 2 for the subjective workload, resulting in anticorrelated (normalized) sensitivity and intercept s b = 1 − s a .…”
Section: Subjective Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…4.1, we assume an equidistant ISA scale so that any deviation from linearity is included in the nonlinearities of the model equations. In a recent publication, we provided evidence for the logistic dependence of ISA-WL on the environmental traffic load variable n and derived a linearized ISA-WL-sensitivity index for subject clustering (Fürstenau et al 2020). The subjective index was successfully applied for the validation of the neurophysiological DFHM WL index (Sect.…”
Section: Subjective Quasi Real-time Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For testing the DFHM-WL index sensitivity, the participants in this analysis were separated into two groups (low and high WL sensitivity) according to their individual linearized WLsensitivity parameters that were formally derived from the logistic ISA characteristic of the subjective self-report measures. Fürstenau et al (2020). In Sects.…”
Section: Neurophysiological (Eeg-based) Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations