IEEE 6th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/mmsp.2004.1436421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based distortion estimation for perceptual classification of video packets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the ki SGT , this study assumes that the cumulative error propagation of succeeding video frames of VP ki by a geometric progression with common ratio r=1. From [7] we find that the error propagation effect strongly depends on the frame position in the GOP, while it is almost independent of the sequence. On the other hand, ki SGS calculates the ratio of the number of intra-refreshed MBs in VP ki to the number of total MBs in VP ki .…”
Section: Determining Significance Grade Of Video Packetsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding the ki SGT , this study assumes that the cumulative error propagation of succeeding video frames of VP ki by a geometric progression with common ratio r=1. From [7] we find that the error propagation effect strongly depends on the frame position in the GOP, while it is almost independent of the sequence. On the other hand, ki SGS calculates the ratio of the number of intra-refreshed MBs in VP ki to the number of total MBs in VP ki .…”
Section: Determining Significance Grade Of Video Packetsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The co-impact of multiple packet loss is modeled in an additive way as in previously discussed approaches because an exhaustive analysis of all possible loss patterns would be computationally intractable. The authors address the limited applicability caused by the large amount of computation needed with a workaround in [26]. They propose to only use AbS to evaluate the distortion introduced in the current frame, while the distortion in succeeding frames is estimated by means of an error propagation model, similar to Babich et al Although the complexity of the modified approach is heavily reduced, its generality is questionable: the model is based on the statistical analysis of several test sequences, but only one GoP structure is considered, a fixed quantization parameter of 28 is used, and plain frame-copy error concealment is assumed.…”
Section: B Sophisticated Prioritization Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of AbS, necessary calculations were therefore carried out in advance, and the results were fed into the sender's scheduler from a cache. The priorities were not derived using a model-based approach as proposed, e.g., in [26], but exhaustively simulated by entirely decoding the sequence for each NAL unit. Consequently, these values are, although obtained at an unreasonable computational cost, of higher precision than estimates delivered by model-based techniques.…”
Section: A Reference Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define v p k as the distortion when the packet p of user k in a GOP is lost. If the distortion by packet p of user k in the current frame is defined as d p k , the distortion v p k can be formulated as the multiplication of LEP and d p k as in [12] v p…”
Section: Rate-distortion Function Including Relative Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it would be impractical to compute the actual distortion of all packets in real-time video transmission due to computational load. To alleviate the computational complexity, [12] presented the hybrid approach. The error concealment (EC) is evaluated with the AbS method, while error propagation (EP) effect is estimated by a statistical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%