2019
DOI: 10.2965/jwet.18-053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Evaluation of the Effect of Discharge-Charge on Electric Power Generation of Microbial Fuel Cells

Abstract: As a method for raising the electric power of microbial fuel cells (MFC), we have noticed that repeat of discharge (closed circuit: CC) and charge (open circuit: OC) produces higher electric power than continuous CC. We tried to find the best interval time for the electric power generation of MFC using compost by experiments and model simulations. As a result of the experiment, the interval time of CC and OC, which was less than 60 seconds, produced about 1.2 times-higher electric power output than the continu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Picioreanu [17,18] developed a three-dimensional MFC model, based on a biofilm simulation, while Pinto [19] developed an electrochemical model which included consideration of methane production. Fujinaga [20] constructed a model containing a diffusion layer to estimate the electric current created through substrate diffusion. If a model existed that considered temperature, simulations using it could provide information about comparative reaction rates at different temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Picioreanu [17,18] developed a three-dimensional MFC model, based on a biofilm simulation, while Pinto [19] developed an electrochemical model which included consideration of methane production. Fujinaga [20] constructed a model containing a diffusion layer to estimate the electric current created through substrate diffusion. If a model existed that considered temperature, simulations using it could provide information about comparative reaction rates at different temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%