2013
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2012.2211411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based Event-Triggered Control for Systems With Quantization and Time-Varying Network Delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
259
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 573 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
259
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Now for event-triggered control it is important to design the event triggering instant such that uncertain system (16) is ISS with a aperiodic control law (15). The approach for deriving the triggering law is discussed below.…”
Section: ) Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now for event-triggered control it is important to design the event triggering instant such that uncertain system (16) is ISS with a aperiodic control law (15). The approach for deriving the triggering law is discussed below.…”
Section: ) Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Triggering condition design: Given an uncertain system (16) with a linear controller (15) there must have an eventtriggering instant t k∈I with a positive inter-execution time (t k+1 − t k = τ > 0) such that the closed loop system (16) is ISS. To prove this there must have an ISS Lyapunov function with the time derivative in the form of (3).…”
Section: ) Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal in this case, because of delays and packet loss induced by the presence of the network in the control loop [Tabuada, 2007;Gupta and Chow, 2010;Garcia and Antsaklis, 2013], is to avoid packets transmission if not necessary, both in the direct path (from the controller to the plant) and in the feedback path (from the sensor to the controller). To achieve this goal a model-based event-triggered MPC/ISM control scheme for nonlinear constrained continuous-time uncertain systems is discussed [Ferrara et al, 2014a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of event-triggered control, measurements are not transmitted periodically in time but they are triggered by the occurrence of certain events. In event-triggered broadcasting [4], [5], [6], [7], and [8], a subsystem sends its local state to the network only when it is necessary, that is, only when a measure of the local subsystem state error is above a specified threshold. Event-triggered control strategies have been used for stabilization of multiple coupled subsystems as in [9], and [10] and in other multiagent applications [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%