2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based functional mixture discriminant analysis with hidden process regression for curve classification

Abstract: In this paper, we study the modeling and the classification of functional data presenting regime changes over time. We propose a new model-based functional mixture discriminant analysis approach based on a specific hidden process regression model that governs the regime changes over time. Our approach is particularly adapted to handle the problem of complex-shaped classes of curves, where each class is potentially composed of several sub-classes, and to deal with the regime changes within each homogeneous sub-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods of functional data analysis are becoming increasingly popular, e.g. in the cluster analysis (Jacques and Preda 2013;James and Sugar 2003;Peng and Müller 2008), classification (Chamroukhi et al 2013;Delaigle and Hall 2012;Mosler and Mozharovskyi 2015;Rossi and Villa 2006) and regression (Ferraty et al 2012;Goia and Vieu 2014;Kudraszow and Vieu 2013;Peng et al 2015;Rachdi and Vieu 2006;Wang et al 2015). Unfortunately, multivariate data methods cannot be directly used for functional data, because of the problem of dimensionality and difficulty in putting functional data into order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods of functional data analysis are becoming increasingly popular, e.g. in the cluster analysis (Jacques and Preda 2013;James and Sugar 2003;Peng and Müller 2008), classification (Chamroukhi et al 2013;Delaigle and Hall 2012;Mosler and Mozharovskyi 2015;Rossi and Villa 2006) and regression (Ferraty et al 2012;Goia and Vieu 2014;Kudraszow and Vieu 2013;Peng et al 2015;Rachdi and Vieu 2006;Wang et al 2015). Unfortunately, multivariate data methods cannot be directly used for functional data, because of the problem of dimensionality and difficulty in putting functional data into order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we present a model that uses a logistic process rather than a Markov process. The resulting model is a MixRHLP (Chamroukhi, ; Chamroukhi et al, ; Samé et al, ).…”
Section: Latent Process Regression Mixtures For Functional Data Clustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each curve represents the consumed power by the switch motor during each switch operation and the aim is to predict the state of the switch given a new operation data, or to cluster the times series to discover possible defaults. These data were studied in Chamroukhi (), Chamroukhi, Samé, Govaert, and Aknin (), Chamroukhi et al (, ), and Samé, Chamroukhi, Govaert, and Aknin (). Figure e shows n = 120 curves where each curve consists of m = 564 observations and Figure f shows n = 146 curves where each curve consists of m = 511 observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it is possible to use the LMoLE to conduct clustering and discrimination of curves in the same manner as in Chamroukhi et al (2010) and Chamroukhi et al (2013), respectively. However, unlike the model of Chamroukhi et al (2013), we cannot trivially extend our methodology to handle the modeling of multiple correlated series simultaneously, although it may be possible to construct such a model using the multivariate generalization of Eltoft et al (2006) (see also Fang et al (1990, Section 3.5)); these functions are generally difficult to work with due to the modified Bessel function in their definitions.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourier basis regression for clustering by MLMMs (Ng et al, 2006), piecewise polynomial regression for clustering (Chamroukhi et al, 2010) and for classification Chamroukhi et al (2013), Gaussian process regression for classification by principal component analysis (Hall et al, 2001) and by centroid-based methods (Delaigle and Hall, 2012), support vector machines (SVMs) for classification (Rossi and Villa, 2006), and nonparametric density estimation for clustering (Boulle, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%