2009
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2009.2020705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Based $\hbox{H}_{\infty}$ Control of a Unified Power Quality Conditioner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To construct a dynamic model, the grid-tied UPQC is transformed to an equivalent model, as depicted in Figure 2 [21]. As the UPQC should compensate for PQ disturbances in most connected loads, the disturbances are modeled as uncertain independent current sources.…”
Section: Upqc Stages and Continuous-time Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct a dynamic model, the grid-tied UPQC is transformed to an equivalent model, as depicted in Figure 2 [21]. As the UPQC should compensate for PQ disturbances in most connected loads, the disturbances are modeled as uncertain independent current sources.…”
Section: Upqc Stages and Continuous-time Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multivariable regulator theory with H infin loop shaping, so that zero steady-state error, robustness to modeling uncertainties and insensitivity to supply frequency variations can be accomplished simultaneously, thus providing a complete theoretical solution to all the aforementioned PQ problems (Kwan and So, 2009). The design is made-up using classic control methods, all of them in the discrete-time-frequency domain and several tests in the laboratory prototype illustrate the overall dynamic and static performance of the system (Munoz et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the continuous variation in the plant parameters and the non linearities conditions, PI controllers may become unable to provide the required control performance [3,4]. These inherent disadvantages of the PI controllers have encouraged the replacement of this controller with adaptive [5,6] and robust [7][8][9] control laws. Adaptive control laws impose a very computation burden while H∞ robust control requires the knowledge of the disturbances boundaries [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%