2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00180-019-00902-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based INAR bootstrap for forecasting INAR(p) models

Abstract: In this paper we analyse some bootstrap techniques to make inference in INAR( p) models. First of all, via Monte Carlo experiments we compare the performances of these methods when estimating the thinning parameters in INAR( p) models; we state the superiority of model-based INAR bootstrap approaches on block bootstrap in terms of low bias and Mean Square Error. Then we adopt the model-based bootstrap methods to obtain coherent predictions and confidence intervals in order to avoid difficulty in deriving the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bisaglia & Gerolimetto (2019) used the empirical distribution Fxnb based on groups of bootstrap resamples of the real data x n to obtain the false(1prefix−αfalse) prediction interval: alignleftalign-1[PFb(α/2),PFb(1α/2)],align-2 where PFbfalse(αfalse) is the αth percentile of the distribution Fxnb. For small values such as α=0.05, as was chosen by Bisaglia & Gerolimetto (2019), almost every observation falls into the forecasting interval. However, this criterion is not very useful for comparing different models.…”
Section: Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bisaglia & Gerolimetto (2019) used the empirical distribution Fxnb based on groups of bootstrap resamples of the real data x n to obtain the false(1prefix−αfalse) prediction interval: alignleftalign-1[PFb(α/2),PFb(1α/2)],align-2 where PFbfalse(αfalse) is the αth percentile of the distribution Fxnb. For small values such as α=0.05, as was chosen by Bisaglia & Gerolimetto (2019), almost every observation falls into the forecasting interval. However, this criterion is not very useful for comparing different models.…”
Section: Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelman et al . (2014) introduced the log‐score criterion (LSC) for predictive accuracy, which is also considered by Bisaglia & Gerolimetto (2019). We adopt this approach for our second criterion, the forecasting log‐score criterion (FLSC): alignleftalign-1FLSC=h=1n2logp^n1+h(xn1+h),align-2 where truep^n1+hfalse(xn1+hfalse)=false(number of correct predictionsfalse)false/m, which is the estimated probability of correctly predicting the value xn1+h.…”
Section: Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the procedure in [16], which performs an out-of-sample experiment to compare forecasting performances of two model-based bootstrap approaches, we introduce the forecasting procedure as follows: For each t = (n 1 + 1), . .…”
Section: Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the procedure in [ 16 ], which performs an out-of-sample experiment to compare forecasting performances of two model-based bootstrap approaches, we introduce the forecasting procedure as follows: For each we estimate an INAR(1) model for the data , then we use the fitted result based on to generate the next five forecasts, which is called the 5-step ahead forecast for each t in , where is the forecast at time t . In this way we obtain many sequences of step-ahead forecasts, finally we replicate the whole procedure P times.…”
Section: Real Data Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%