2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based optimisation of CT imaging parameters for dimensional measurements on multimaterial workpieces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The voltage correlates to the maximum X-ray photon energy and the current to the spectrum intensity [7]. In the best-case scenario, the CT parameters are chosen according to the known geometry and material composition of the sample under investigation [8,9]. Resulting absorption profiles are recorded and stored in the form of projection images.…”
Section: Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voltage correlates to the maximum X-ray photon energy and the current to the spectrum intensity [7]. In the best-case scenario, the CT parameters are chosen according to the known geometry and material composition of the sample under investigation [8,9]. Resulting absorption profiles are recorded and stored in the form of projection images.…”
Section: Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ultrasound, focal microscopy) was investigated, although, the focus was not on surface geometry determination [17][18][19][20]. This paper advances the state of the art presented in [4,[8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20] by:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One difficulty is the a-priori determination of the surface geometry of the measured parts [8]. Due to the physical characteristics of x-rays and limitations of the reconstruction process, inhomogeneities occur in XCT measurements of parts with strongly varying part dimensions or absorption coefficients [9,10]. These appear due to measurement artefacts caused by a combination of varying absorption behaviours of the x-rays (figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energies for this approach must be maximally different but sufficient to radiograph the assembly. Therefore, the best possible assembly orientation cannot be determined based on the minimization of the measurement energy, as has been done in previous studies [10][11][12]. In addition, simple minimization of the penetration length is unsuitable for multi-material assemblies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%