2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based prediction of optogenetic sound encoding in the human cochlea by future optical cochlear implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that a novel modality of stimulation for artificial hearing, such as optical stimulation, would be warranted. In vivo and in silico preclinical studies confirmed the expectation that the oCI achieves near physiological (i.e., acoustic/natural hearing) spectral selectivity (Dieter et al, 2019(Dieter et al, , 2020bKeppeler et al, 2020;Khurana et al, 2022), fundamentally exceeding that of state-of-the-art eCI, thereby promising more independent stimulation channels in the oCI than amenable to the eCI (≤10). Moreover, preclinical studies suggest an increased output dynamic range using the oCI over the eCI (Bali et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This suggests that a novel modality of stimulation for artificial hearing, such as optical stimulation, would be warranted. In vivo and in silico preclinical studies confirmed the expectation that the oCI achieves near physiological (i.e., acoustic/natural hearing) spectral selectivity (Dieter et al, 2019(Dieter et al, , 2020bKeppeler et al, 2020;Khurana et al, 2022), fundamentally exceeding that of state-of-the-art eCI, thereby promising more independent stimulation channels in the oCI than amenable to the eCI (≤10). Moreover, preclinical studies suggest an increased output dynamic range using the oCI over the eCI (Bali et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In the human cochlea, where there is a greater distance between the emitter and the neural tissue, optical arrays of micro-LEDs are still predicted to significantly reduce the spread of activation in the cochlea to 0.4-1.0 octaves, up to fourfold lower than electrical stimulation [93,94]. While modelling data suggests waveguides could provide even greater spectral selectivity [95], the fraxicon technology presented here could potentially be used to focus the emission cone and improve the spectral resolution provided by LEDs in the human cochlea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the human cochlea, where there is a greater distance between the emitter and the neural tissue, optical arrays of micro-LEDs are still predicted to significantly reduce the spread of activation in the cochlea to 0.4-1.0 octaves, up to 4-fold lower than electrical stimulation [35,36]. While modelling data suggests waveguides could provide even greater spectral selectivity [37], the fraxicon technology presented here could potentially be used to focus the emission cone and improve the spectral resolution provided by LEDs in the human cochlea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%